Twenty years after, mystery still clouds Battle of the Beanfield

Tony Thompson, crime correspondent
Sunday June 12, 2005
The Observer

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1504681,00.html

It looked just like a carnival – at first. The weather was sunny and music played as the 140 vehicles set off towards Stonehenge. The 600 or so Travellers were on their way to attend the annual free festival on squatted land beside the ancient stones.
A few hours later the convoy had been ambushed by more than 1,300 police officers; dozens of Travellers were injured, all but a handful were arrested, and every one of their vehicles was destroyed.

This month marks the 20th anniversary of what has become known as the Battle of the Beanfield. Despite four months’ planning, the police operation to stop the convoy was a shambles. Faulty police intelligence suggested the Travellers were armed with chainsaws, hammers, petrol bombs and even firearms. All this information was false.

Plans to stop the convoy near the A303 collapsed when a convoy outrider spotted the roadblock and directed the travellers down a side road, where they encountered a second roadblock. After a first wave of violent assaults by the police, in which windscreens were smashed and the occupants dragged out screaming, most of the vehicles broke into a neighbouring field, derailing the police plan further.

For the next four hours there was a standoff, while Assistant Chief Constable Lionel Grundy, the officer in charge, insisted all Travellers had to be arrested.

The final assault began at 7pm, by which time all the officers had changed into riot gear. Pregnant women were clubbed with truncheons, as were those holding babies. The journalist Nick Davies, then working for The Observer, saw the violence. ‘They were like flies around rotten meat,’ he wrote, ‘and there was no question of trying to make a lawful arrest. They crawled all over, truncheons flailing, hitting anybody they could reach. It was extremely violent and very sickening.’

When some of those remaining tried to get away, driving their vehicles through the beanfield, the police threw anything they could lay their hands on – fire extinguishers, stones, shields and truncheons – at them in order to bring them to a halt. The empty vehicles were then systematically smashed to pieces and several were set on fire. Seven healthy dogs belonging to the Travellers were put down by officers from the RSPCA. In total, 537 people were arrested – the most arrests to take place on any single day since the Second World War.

All those arrested were charged with obstruction of the police and the highway, but most of the charges were dismissed in the courts. The Travellers’ unexpected saviour was the Earl of Cardigan, whose family owned the forest where the convoy had stayed the night before. Cardigan had tagged along out of interest, and his descriptions of the violence prevented what might otherwise have become a major miscarriage of justice.

Cardigan recalled that in many cases ‘the smashing up of the vehicles and the instructions to ‘Get Out! Get Out! Get Out!’ and hand over your keys were given simultaneously and therefore there was no chance to understand what was being shouted at you, and to comply before your vehicle started disintegrating around you with your windscreen broken in and your side panels beaten by truncheons and so on.’

It remains a mystery why the police felt compelled to use such violence. With evidence that radio logs of conversations between officers on the day have been altered, the full story may never be known.

‘The Battle of the Beanfield remains a black day for British justice and civil liberties,’ says Andy Worthington, whose book on the event is published this week. ‘From the anti-Traveller legislation of the 1986 Public Order Act and the 1994 Criminal Justice Act to the current hysteria surrounding Gypsy and traveller settlements, the repercussions are still being felt.’

· The Battle of the Beanfield, edited by Andy Worthington, is published by Enabler Publications on Wednesday, £12.95.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Sheffield G8 Events :: Pictures so far.

These are a sample of my ‘stills’, taken at events on the Saturday 11th June that I’m contributing to the Sheffield G8 Film.

Sheffield ‘Stop the War’ March [anti-G8] :: The Pictures

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/06/313288.html

Sheffield Peace in the Park [anti-G8] :: The Pictures

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/06/313309.html

&&&
Nottingham Indymedia crew making video of Sheffield’s opposition to G8 meetings

http://dev2.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2005/06/741.html

Details of the Nottingham Indymedia film progress on the Wiki at:

http://docs.indymedia.org/view/Local/NottsFilm1

The main events in Sheffield for the G8 Justice and Home Affairs Ministers, is from the 15th – 17th June.

More to follow …….

Posted in . | Leave a comment

RSS Feeds

They save you visiting lots of websites, to see if anythings changed yet. Very useful for Indymedia Newswire and the like.

BBC Advice page: RSS Feed (Really Simple Syndication)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/rss/3223484.stm

The really simple future of the web

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3503509.stm

Here is a selection of feedreader, that you can choose from, depending on free or not, what operating system, mac or pc etc.

Google Directory – Feedreaders
The ones I use [both of which are free] are:

Feedreader: http://www.feedreader.com

and

RSS Popper – RSS aggregator for Outlook [this can be used within Microsoft Outlook, and its ver convenient]

http://rsspopper.blogspot.com
http://rsspopper.blogspot.com/2004/10/documentation.html

**********

For those that want to follow it up, these are the Feed addresses I’m watching for Sheffield G8 stuff and other matters ……

yorkshire today
http://rss.jpress.co.uk/ed55YPOS.rss

BBC News South Yorkshire
http://news.bbc.co.uk/rss/newsonline_uk_edition/england/south_yorkshire/rss.xml

Indymedia UK Newswire
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/newswire.rss

Indymedia Sheffield Newswire
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/sheffield/newswire.rss

Tash’s Blog
http://tash_lodge.blogspot.com/atom.xml

by putting these into a feedreader, you thus would have up-to-date info delivered to your inbox.

Hope this helps

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Press Release from South Yorkshire Police: G8 meeting in Sheffield

NEWS RELEASE FROM SOUTH YORKSHIRE POLICE
Date: 7/6/2005

G8 Policing Plans Inc reference:

Sheffield is hosting the UK Presidency G8 Justice & Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting from 15-17th June, involving ministers from the eight G8 nations (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States of America).

South Yorkshire Police has the responsibility of ensuring not only that this event takes place in safety and security but also that people have the opportunity to protest within the law and that minimum disruption is caused to everyday life.

This balance is a delicate one, involving a huge amount of detailed organisation, intelligence gathering and assessment, discussion with both partners and with representatives of protest groups, meetings with local communities and others who might be affected by the event.

If we are to discharge this responsibility effectively a combination of elements must be in place: the event must take place in an orderly environment and this will necessarily involve temporary changes to routine; those wishing to protest must co-operate with the police; and powers must be available to enable police to deal with specific circumstances that experience tells us are possible.

The main meeting is taking place at the Marriott Hotel, with functions in the city centre on Wednesday 15th and Thursday 16th. As part of the arrangements for the event some limited road closures will occur at specific times, which should cause minimal disruption. Sheffield City Council and South Yorkshire Police have agreed the following road closures, which will mean that there will be no access for vehicles. These are:

Kenwood Road, adjacent to the Marriott Hotel (between the junctions of Rundle Road and Cherry Tree Road), will be closed from 10.00 am Monday 13th June until 6.00 pm Friday 17th June. Local businesses and residents have been contacted individually by South Yorkshire Police and appropriate security arrangements and screenings put in place.

The Winter Garden and Millennium Galleries will host a formal welcome reception on the evening of Wednesday 15th June. South Yorkshire Police will close several roads around the venue; Surrey Street from its junction with Norfolk Street down to Arundel Gate will close from 12 noon (there will also be limited pedestrian access), Norfolk Street will close to vehicles from 4.00pm and Arundel Gate from 5.45pm. Central Library will close at 4.00pm, access to the library from 12 noon will be via the children’s library entrance at the Arundel Gate end of Surrey Street. The Graves Art Gallery will close earlier than normal. The Winter Garden and Millennium Galleries will be closed all day on the 15th June.

The Cutlers’ Hall will host a Gala Dinner in the evening. Again several roads around the venue will close from 4.00pm onwards including Church Street, High Street, Fargate, York Street and several side roads. Supertram will be affected, terminating at Castle Square and Hanover Way for both inward and outbound journeys from 4.00pm.

Other than these limited local restrictions on these specific dates the remainder of the City Centre will operate as normal.

Our approach to dealing with protest is to achieve a balance between facilitating lawful activities (including the right to protest), protecting life and property and minimising disruption.

In terms of powers available to the police to enable this approach to work, the following will apply:

Section 13 of the Public Order Act 1986 enables police to ban marches and processions in specifies areas.

Section 14 of the same Act enables police to place conditions on public assemblies and restrictions on the locations in which they can be held.

Section 14A of the same Act enables the police to deal with protestors trespassing onto property.

We have applied to the Home Office through the city council for powers under Section 13 and 14A to be available to police from 0001 hours on Wednesday June 15th 2005 until 1800 hours on Friday June 17th 2005 and Section 14A from 1800 hours on Monday June 13th to 1800 hours on Friday June 17th 2005.

The Chief Constable will use powers under Section 14 to allow lawful protestors who co-operate with police to have the opportunity to voice their opinions. With this in mind, we are considering two protests in close proximity to the evening venues. We will limit protestor numbers to ensure a balance between the rights of the protestors and those attending the event.

Those acting unlawfully or violently will be firmly dealt with using existing police powers. The Chief Constable has the necessary resources to deal with all issues identified.

G8 MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE, SHEFFIELD

ROAD CLOSURES CITY CENTRE

WINTER GARDEN/MILLENNIUM GALLERIES

Wednesday 15th June 2005.

6am Cones placed on Surrey Street and Norfolk Street No parking and supervised deliveries 8am Enforcement of parking restriction 12 midday Restrictions imposed upon access to Tudor Square 4pm Norfolk Street closed to vehicles 5.45pm Arundel Gate closed to vehicles and pedestrian access restricted to: · Arundel Gate Car Park (access via Pond Street only) · Odeon Cinema · Sheffield Hallam University (access from Pond Street only) · Novotel limited access for guests only

CUTLERS’ HALL

Thursday 16th June 2005

6am Cones placed on St James Street, St James Row and Vicar Lane. No parking. 4pm Restricted access to Cathedral Square from St James Row, East Parade, Church Street and High Street 4pm Road Closures · Church Street junction with Leopold Street · High Street junction with Arundel Gate · Vicar Lane junction with Campo Lane · St James Row · East Parade · York Street

4pm Supertram will terminate at Castle Square and Upper Hanover Street tram stops for both inward and outward journeys. Buses will be re-routed from High Street and Church Street 5.45pm Pedestrian access restricted

· Fargate junction with Exchange Gateway · High Street junction with George Street · Leopold Street junction with Orchard Street · Norfolk Street junction with Chapel Walk

—————————————————————

In March 2005, the Environment Ministers met in Derby, for and earlier junket in the G8 series of meetings. As we prepare for events in Sheffield, I thought it pertinent to remind all of the imagery from that event, and what we can expect for the future:

Derby Piccys Pt1 G8 Environment ministers Meeting: http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/03/306935.html

Derby Piccys Pt2 G8 Environment ministers Meeting: http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/03/306956.html

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yorkshire Post Article

Protests row as summit comes to city : Police accused of crackdown on marches

POLICE responsible for security at next week’s G8 summit meetings in Yorkshire are facing growing criticism from protesters who claim they will be kept away from the participants.
Paul Whitehouse
07 June 2005

http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=55&ArticleID=1047406

The Justice and Home Affairs ministers from the G8 countries are meeting in Sheffield from Wednesday to Friday next week, June 15-17.
The series of meetings has attracted attention from protesters who want to demonstrate against the G8 countries’ support for the war in Iraq.
But with little more than a week to go before the start of the summit, they are still waiting for South Yorkshire Police to announce what restrictions will be in place.
However, it is widely anticipated that the protesters will be kept to an area in Devonshire Green when the visiting ministers are in the city centre.
Devonshire Green is a substantial distance from the venues being used to host events in the city centre.
For years campaigners have enjoyed a positive relationship with South Yorkshire Police over the way demonstrations are organised and marshalled.
Members of Sheffield Stop the War Coalition are planning to demonstrate during the summit and chairman Lucinda Wakefield said: “Sheffield Stop the War Coalition has organised demonstrations of thousands of people – in fact the biggest protests of the last few years. On not one of those occasions has anyone come to any harm.”
A demonstration in advance of the summit will take place in the city centre on Saturday, supported by organisations including Sheffield Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Sheffield Muslim Association of Britain, Sheffield Trades Council, Stop Political Terror, Sheffield CND, Sheffield Respect and Sheffield Green Party.
Organisers hope that event will attract support of thousands of people and a route has been agreed with police, the coalition providing its own stewards.
Ms Wakefield said: “It is a great shame, therefore, that we still have no clear agreement from South Yorkshire Police for our planned protests on Wednesday at the Winter Gardens and Thursday at Cutler’s Hall..
“We want to make our voices heard to the G8 ministers, we would like to be seen by them.”
She added: “In a city where even the council voted against the war in Iraq we consider it of vital importance that we raise our voices to some of the ministers concerned.
“It is not good enough for us to be penned in on Devonshire Green where they cannot hear us. It would be an abuse of our civil liberties, and a great shame in a city that has a proud record of standing up for peace and justice.
“We are currently seeking legal advice on this possible ban, which does not even seem to concur with the law. We shall not be silenced.”
Sheffield’s Liberal Democrats are also concerned about the way the G8 protests are being handled.
The city council’s Liberal Democrat leader Paul Scriven. said: “Many streets in the city centre including Fargate will be closed off to the public. It is already public knowledge that protesters will be penned into an enclosure in Devonshire Green and not allowed to march, with exclusion zones operating in the city centre.
“The Liberal Democrats believe that people have a right to protest and should not be penned into a small area a considerable distance away from the actual event. They also believe that people should be able to move around the city centre lawfully with as little disruption as possible.
“We are worried about civil liberties issues and that the overly restrictive controls have the potential to cause unnecessary unrest amongst protesters and unnecessary inconvenience to local people,” he added.
South Yorkshire Police are planning to give precise details of the powers they will use shortly. A spokeswoman insisted the force would only “seek those powers that are considered appropriate for the summit in Sheffield”.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Wiltshire Police hail the success of anti rave measures

Press Release 06/06/2005

http://www.wiltshire.police.uk/news/newsview.asp?id=715

Wiltshire Police are encouraged by the success of the operation to prevent raves being set up in the county, particularly in Savernake Forest, and intend to continue gathering intelligence to identify other likely targets throughout the summer. Inspector Jerry Dawson, who is based in Marlborough confirms it is still the intention to vigorously enforce current legislation and take positive action.

Operation Acoustic gathered information from a wide range of sources, including the internet and local residents. It was clear that an attempt to hold a rave in Savernake Forest was planned for the bank holiday week-end at the end of May but news of Wiltshire’s stance persuaded organisers to look elsewhere. The Police press release, carried by the BBC Wiltshire website, was copied onto several rave forum websites and the chatroom content clearly showed plans were being changed.

A couple of links stated that Savernake was an ideal location for a party and it was such a shame the venue had to be changed due to “Old Bill crawling all over the forest”. In the event a large event was staged in Wales.

The first part of the operation in Wiltshire was very successful as a smaller rave was also stopped during the setting up stage by resources at Walkers Hill in Pewsey on Saturday 28th May.

The second part of the operation, concerning the 20th Anniversary of Beanfield, had been widely advertised on the internet – but so was the police planned operation against it. Many links to the police press release were posted on websites; however, up to twenty vehicles containing New Age Travellers turned up at Postern Hill, Savernake during the day and were turned away. A makeshift sign was placed alongside the A346 road by individuals who attempted to direct other persons to Postern Hill Picnic Site in Savernake. This sign was removed by Police.

At around 7.00 pm on the 31st of May 2005 a barrier was broken at Hat Gate, Savernake and a large log that was blocking the entrance to the picnic site was dragged out of the way by a heavy vehicle . Eight large vehicles and their numerous occupants then began to set up a party with loud music but Operation Acoustic officers on duty closed it down and moved them on before they could enter the picnic site and become established.

Comments posted on the internet after the week-end have confirmed that the actions by Wiltshire Police prevented a large rave from occurring over the bank holiday week-end and thwarted the plans of many groups which would have resulted in misery for local residents and criminal damage to the area. Inspector Jerry Dawson said:

‘Operation Acoustic will continue to monitor activities throughout the summer and whatever action is necessary will be taken to ensure such unwelcome anti-social behaviour does not take place within the county.’

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Mc Libel on the beeb

and about time too

check out BBC2 tonight at 10pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/storyville/mclibel.shtml

Two contemporary issues that frustrate liberals are the prevalence of fast-food outlets and the continuing outrage of the British libel laws, which stack the odds in favour of the plaintiff, especially when he, she or it is powerful.

Both these preoccupations are neatly brought together in McLibel, a hilarious and engrossing account of the seven years in which McDonald’s attempted to extract damages from two penniless London activists.

Great moments in the film include the appearance of McDonald’s executives, defending their fare and the bizarre transformation of the protagonists from neophytes into seasoned cross-examiners. The dramatic courtroom reconstructions were filmed by Ken Loach, and are very funny. Call me biased, but I learnt more from this film (and laughed much more) than I did in Super Size Me

made by http://www.spannerfilms.net/?lid=161

and of course M c S P O T L I G H T http://www.mcspotlight.org

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Nottingham City Transport not giving change on their buses

This item had earlier appeared in “Nottingham Alternative News”

http://www.veggies.org.uk/AlternativeNews

LETTER: You are being ripped off (if you catch a bus)
Phil Shelton

I have always had an issue with Nottingham City Transport not giving change on their buses, as I often had to pay more than the fare, having no change. Some years ago, I was lodging at the home of a high ranking employee of NCT who informed me of a way to get my hard-earned cash back. It appears that NCT legally has to be able to provide change to its customers or it cannot operate as a bus company!

So you say to yourself, how are they operating when they obviously do not give change on thier buses? Well, it’s simple, it is called an Excess Fare Slip, which can be written out by a driver for you to take to the cash office in the Market Square. There, you can redeem the value of your overpaid fare and so claim YOUR hard earned cash back. This unknown right that all Nottingham’s citizens have is largely unspoken of as NCT apparently has no intention of letting the public know about this.

This I can only imagine is due to financial reasons… think of all the journeys where people pay extra, that’s one hell of a lot of money! Where does it go? Community groups? Charity? No, of course not, it goes to the bus company. Ignorance is bliss in the case of this greedy, selfish, self-serving company who does not care for its customers and implicitly rips them off.

Next time you overpay, be sure to demand that the driver write out an Excess Fare Slip. It is your legal right. If enough of us do this, perhaps NCT will have to review its sorry “Sorry, no change” policy.

____________________________________________

so, with all the above in mind …. I tried it out, having the incorrect change on the bus on the way home. The following letter to Nottingham City Transport sets out the case. If I get a response, I’ll tell you all about it…….! Reading this article has saved me 30p.

____________________________________________

Nottingham City Transport
Customer Services

Saturday 04 June 2005

Sir,

I am a freelance journalist.

I am writing a number of pieces connected with the ‘integrated transport policy’ in the regions.

I note the number of different policies that there are in the many bus companies serving the East Midlands on a number of issues.

Specifically I now write to you, asking about the giving of change.

While I appreciate that not giving change might be considered advantageous for the ‘free flow’ of the queue, it can be quite off-putting to some customers. Surely a consideration when trying to make the bus a viable alternative in travel to and from the city. Also, it was my understanding that having a policy about the giving of change was a legal requirement for the running of a service.

Thus on Saturday afternoon, I put the issue to the test. I caught a number 45 bus [reg no: V424 DRC] at 2.30 on Saturday 4th June from city centre to Woodborough Road.

The fare was £1.20. However, I only had £1.50 in change. I therefore asked the driver if he gave change. He said he didn’t. I then asked for an “Excess Fare Slip” with the intention of claiming back the excess from your office at a later date. Unfortunately, the driver didn’t have one and seemed amazed I’d asked for such a thing. He asked for my address on a piece of paper and a proof of identity. I showed him my press card. In the mean-time, I’m holding up the queue. Eventually, the driver managed to get another passenger with sufficient change to give me some and therefore for us both to deal with our exact fare.

I thanked the driver for this. But I still asked if he normally had a supply of Excess Fare Slips. He said that he did, but on this occasion, they were in his other jacket. I think it important to tell you that the driver was polite throughout this exchange.

Looking for further guidance on this issue, I had looked over the company website at: http://www.nctx.co.uk and can find no reference to this facility.

I imagine that there are many times through the normal operation of the company, that customers are unable to give the exact change for their journey. I’m thus prompted to ask if you keep an account of the monies accrued by such overpayment.

I would appreciate your comments.

regards

Alan Lodge

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Keyboard cops :: your hard drive can put you behind bar

Independent :: 01 June 2005

Forget leaving fingerprints at the scene of the crime. Today’s police know that the hard evidence they find on your hard drive can put you behind bars, says Jimmy Lee Shreeve

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/story.jsp?story=643152

Computer forensic analysts – the detectives of the digital world – are in big demand. Electronic evidence is proving critical in solving crimes, with the proliferation of computers, PDAs, mobile phones and even iPods.

An internet bookmark or deleted e-mail can be vital to securing a conviction. In South Dakota, a woman was found drowned in her bath with high levels of temazepam in her blood. It looked like suicide – until investigators looked at her husband’s computer and found he’d been researching painless killing methods online. With this evidence, prosecutors were able to convict him.

Law-enforcement agencies have realised that electronic evidence can help catch all kinds of criminals, not just hackers, and are scrambling to hire skilled people. In Britain, the Metropolitan Police is advertising for recruits. “Successful candidates will be involved in the analysis of computer-based media, advising officers on their findings and giving evidence in court,” the advert says.

In the US, the FBI manages a growing number of computer forensics labs. In 1984, the bureau’s magnetic media programme dealt with three cases; last year, its labs handled more than 1,500.

“The whole market is growing exponentially,” says Andy Frowen (pictured above), a director of CCL-Forensics (www.ccl-forensics.com), a Warwickshire company supplying computer forensic services to 10 UK constabularies. “More people own PCs and are connected to the internet, and the police are increasingly aware that these devices can be used to commit or facilitate crime.”

In the past, equipment was usually seized in connection with suspected paedophile or hacking offences. But today, says Frowen, “they seize computers in murder, rape and fraud cases. Almost every crime at some point touches a computer.”

It’s crucial that the evidence stays intact, so digital forensic examiners never work directly on suspects’ computers. “Every time you look at a file, it changes – the date stamp, for instance, would register the day and time you opened the file, contaminating the evidence,” says Neil Barrett, a professor of criminology at Cranfield University and the author of Traces of Guilt (Corgi, 2005).

“We preserve digital evidence using a method known as ‘imaging’ or ‘freezing’. A suspect’s hard drive is removed and put in a computer that is ‘write blocked’ and can’t write to the disk. A forensic image is then taken of that hard drive – an exact clone that can be examined.”

The most widely used software for this is EnCase (www.guidancesoftware.com), a proprietary Windows-based program. The mantra is: delete doesn’t mean gone. Deleting a file, emptying the bin or even reformatting a hard drive will not necessarily get rid of evidence. This is because computers retain data even after it has been deleted.

Not surprisingly, software is available that deletes and overwrites data. One such program is the Privacy Suite from CyberScrub (www.cyberscrub.com), which claims to “remove all evidence of online activity, erase previously ‘deleted’ files, and securely destroy e-mail”. Such programs have legitimate uses – bank details or health records would be at risk if you sold your computer or others gained access to it.

Criminals can use this to cover their tracks, but it is time-consuming. “It can take four or five hours, which makes it less attractive to criminals because they are put out of action for that time,” says Chris Vaughan, the senior forensic analyst at the Manchester computer forensics firm Cy4or (www.cy4or.co.uk). “And to remove everything, the file-wiping software has to know exactly where to wipe. If it doesn’t get this right, traces will be left.”

So are criminals staying one step ahead of the law? “It’s bizarre,” says Barrett. “The criminals should be one step ahead of us, because all they need do is encrypt their files. Yet those we catch rarely do this. Maybe we’re only catching the idiots.”

Computer forensics is most commonly used in cases of child pornography, which means forensic analysts have to see upsetting images. Emma Webb-Hobson of Cy4or says she copes by cutting her mind off from the subject. “The comforting thing is that you’re helping to stop this kind of crime,” she says.

Many in the legal process now need some technical knowledge. In the Harold Shipman case, the doctor had modified evidence on his computer and was caught out by the date stamp on the records. “That obviously requires a jury to understand what a date stamp is and how it can and can’t be modified,” Barrett says. “That requires someone to provide an interpretation in plain English.”

Jeff Fischbach, a US computer forensic analyst, says one downside in digital evidence-gathering is that people are being falsely charged. A client was charged with possessing child porn on his computer, but Fischbach showed that the images came from spam and pop-ups.

What can an innocent person do if their computer is seized by police? Vaughan says: “Law enforcement agencies ask us to look for signs of intent – did somebody run multiple searches for ‘child pornography’, or open and view an illegal image hundreds of times?”

“So the advice to anybody who accidentally gets a pop-up is to close it instantly and, if possible, delete the internet cache. The same goes for spam that gets through filters – delete it. This will show that you didn’t want the material and didn’t look at it for longer than you needed to.”

The field of computer forensics is constantly evolving to keep pace with new devices. Any device that can store data can be used to harbour indecent images, illegal software or fraudulent documents.

But criminals should heed the words of the computer forensics expert John Mallery: “The only secure computer [or digital device] is the one you never turn on, bury in the ground and cover with dirt.”

*********

Further to this lot, I’ve been keeping pages about the authorities progress with surveillance techniques, as they pertain to protest, direct action on social struggles and environmental matters. Here are the direct links ::

Big Brother Awards: http://tash.gn.apc.org/big_brother.htm
surv – start: http://tash.gn.apc.org/surv_10.htm
surv – watched: http://tash.gn.apc.org/watched1.htm
surv – face recog: http://tash.gn.apc.org/face_rec.htm
surv – Nomad: http://tash.gn.apc.org/nomad_10.htm
surv – mayday 2000&1: http://tash.gn.apc.org/surv_mday1.htm
Digital / evidence: http://tash.gn.apc.org/digital_man.htm

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Battle of the Beanfield – 20 Years on :: SchNews500

SchNews 500 http://www.schnews.org.uk/archive/news500.htm#four

June 1st was the 20th anniversary of the Battle of the Beanfield, a notoriously brutal one-sided confrontation between 450 unarmed travellers – including many women and children – and a quasi-military police force of over 1,300 police and MoD. Bolstered by a mandate from on high, and some dodgy injunctions, preventing 83 named individuals from approaching Stonehenge, the police brought to a violent end the 11th annual Stonehenge Free Festival, and set about ‘decommissioning’ the new Travellers’ movement.

For the festival and the travellers had joined the ranks of Thatcher’s ‘enemies within.’ With the eviction of squats in the late ’70s and widespread unemployment, thousands of people bought old buses and trucks and took to the roads each year. Many found a living on the free festival circuit, whose central focus was the gathering at Stonehenge, which had become an alternative state of 100,000 people by 1984.

Despite four months’ planning, the police operation was a shambles. Plans to stop the convoy at a roadblock near the A303, blocking it at the front and back, collapsed when an outrider
spotted the roadblock and directed the convoy down a side road, where they met a second roadblock. After a first wave of violent assaults by the police, in which windscreens were smashed and the occupants dragged out screaming, most of the vehicles broke into a
neighbouring field, derailing the police plan still further.

For the next four hours, there was an uneasy stand-off, while Lionel Grundy, the officer in charge, insisted that everyone was to be arrested under the pretext of finding out who had committed a number of alleged crimes earlier in the day (the theft of some petrol and a bit of shoplifting). ‘That’s crazy,’ said one of the travellers. ‘If you had a couple of football hooligans in a football stadium, you wouldn’t arrest everybody in the stadium
just to get at the hooligans.’

But Grundy wasn’t listening. The final assault began at 7 pm, when the police arrested men, women and children with indiscriminate violence, pursuing the stragglers as they fled into a neighbouring Beanfield. Nick Davies of The Observer saw what happened when the police surrounded the last vehicle: ‘They were like flies around rotten meat… there was no question of trying to make a lawful arrest… They just crawled all over that vehicle, with truncheons flailing, hitting anybody that they could reach. It was extremely violent and very sickening.’

By the end of the day, 537 people had been arrested – 420 at the Beanfield, and most of the rest at Stonehenge itself, where a separate gathering was also broken up. All were dispersed to holding cells throughout southern England, dozens of women were strip-searched, and social services took children into care. At the Beanfield, the remaining vehicles were systematically looted and smashed.

All those arrested were charged with obstruction of the police and the highway, but most of the charges were dismissed in the courts. The travellers’ unexpected saviour was the Earl of Cardigan, whose family owned the forest where the convoy had stayed the night before. On the day, Cardigan had tagged along out of interest, and his descriptions of a heavily pregnant woman being clubbed, and of riot police showering a woman and child with glass, prevented what would otherwise have been a severe miscarriage of justice.

20 years on, what happened at the Beanfield remains relevant in a number of ways. Without the events of that day, the steady erosion of civil liberties over the last two decades would not have been so easily achieved. Gypsies and travellers have been targeted in particular, but you can see the chain of events that leads from the Beanfield to the 1986 Public Order Act, the 1994 Criminal Justice Act and the legislation dreamt up by the current government, that the repercussions of that dark day for British
justice – on our right to gather, to party, to protest, to dissent – are still being felt.

For the full story, see the new book ‘The Battle of the Beanfield’, edited by Andy Worthington www.andyworthington.co.uk

*********

Please also see earlier posting on all this at:

The Travellers Situation: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/312109.html

&&

Anniversary of the ‘Battle of the Beanfield’: ‘Operation Solstice’

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/312088.html

*********

SchNews is 500 today. Happy Birthday guys. jolly well done. Solid work you’ve done there!!

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Travellers ousted from forest camp

http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/wiltshire/marlborough/news/MARLB_NEWS_LOCAL0.html

THERE were some tense moments when police had a face-to-face confrontation with a group of travellers who settled in Savernake Forest on Tuesday evening.

All weekend extra officers had been on duty manning access points to the forest after police received information that a major rave could take place there to mark the 20th anniversary of the Battle of the Beanfield, when police clashed with New Age travellers at Cholderton.

The expected anniversary rave did not materialise although police said lorries carrying mobile stages had been seen in the area but were deterred by the large number of officers guarding accesses to the forest.

The police cordons were due to be discontinued yesterday.

However on Tuesday a small band of travellers, most of them from eco groups from West Wales, set up camp at the forest’s Hatt Gate picnic area on the Wootton Rivers road.

About half a dozen vehicles got past a wooden barrier, that was later found damaged, shortly before 7pm. A powerful battery-powered amplifier was set up and music could be heard at the nearest homes at Hatt Gate a quarter of a mile away.

Police led by the Marlborough sector commander Insp Jerry Dawson were quickly at the scene.

After confirming that the travellers had no permission to camp from the landowner, the Savernake Estate, police asked them to move.

Some of the campers had been drinking and demanded to be allowed to stay.

With just a handful of police officers a few yards away to back him up if necessary ­ although there were more waiting in other parts of the forest to provide reinforcements ­ the inspector talked with the travellers and calmed the situation.

One of the travellers called Ian said they had headed for Wiltshire to commemorate the Battle of the Beanfield although he was too young to be there in 1985.

He said: “We want to mark the fact that 20 years ago the police broke the law when they made all those arrests at the Battle of the Beanfield.

“Although the police actions were later declared illegal they have never apologised. What they did was out of order and we would like an apology.”

After speaking to the travellers Insp Dawson said: “They said they would move on if I apologised for the police actions at the Battle of the Beanfield.

“I said to them that if they felt they had been mistreated then I was sorry and they appeared happy with that.”

Some two-and-a-half hours after arriving at Hatt Gate, the travellers left and headed south on the A346 to Burbage and then to Grafton where they did a U-turn and headed back to Burbage and then drove through the Collingbournes before spending the night at Amesbury.

After they left Hatt Gate officers discovered the barrier into the picnic site had been broken.

Insp Dawson said: “It looks as though they were planning to get into the site and probably have more travellers join them if we had let them stay.”

Police remained at Hatt Gate until the barrier was mended.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Stonehenge: A thought for today

– a bit of rhetoric from Judge Maclaren Webster, when he overturned the convictions of Richard and Margaret by Salisbury Magistrates for being at the 10th anniversary demo at the stones on June 1st 1995. (They were then re-convicted by the Appeal Court before being cleared by the Lords ruling on assemblies.) Section 14A refers to the Public Order Act 1986 as amended by the CJA.

“Each case turns upon its own facts and this one is a particular example of that. It will, perhaps, be sadly rare when no form of criminal conduct other than that which it is sought to catch by Section 14A will have been committed. It will also, perhaps, be sadly rare to find that tolerance, reason, patience and a degree of mutual respect and understanding characterises the relationships between Poiice and those assembled. Perhaps when it comes to the tenth Anniversary of the tenth
Anniversary of the Battle of Beanfield it will be remembered that thanks to those characteristics I have sought to identify which amount to nothing more or less than realising the humanity of all those present, the lst June 1995 was indeed a significant day in the development of the maintenance of Public Order around that great Monument.”

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Earth First: Guide to Public Order Situations

Those of you that know my photography, know I’m frequently involved in Public Order Situations …….

It is my opinion that photographers should not be involved in these ‘dynamics’ of protest. It is important for your continued capability to cover the event, that you are distinctive from those engaged in the protest. The same would be true of ‘legal observers’. The police will thus treat you the same as everyone else.

But I would however still suggest that you are aware of this Earth First Advice, since it may help you interpret the scene before you.

http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/manchester/porder.htm – webpage

http://www.earthfirst.org.uk/manchester/porder.pdf – a PDF for print out

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Anniversary of the ‘Battle of the Beanfield’: ‘Operation Solstice’

Some recent postings on Indymedia, in remembrance of this anniversary:

Anniversary of the ‘Battle of the Beanfield’ 1st June 1985
It’s 20 years, since the major trashing of my community, travelling on the way the make the “Peoples Free Festival of Albion” at Stonehenge. It was a regular event on the calender.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/312088.html

&

The Travellers Situation

Travellers come from many backgrounds. But similarities far outweigh differnces, in peoples expectations on what they want out of life. Recently, politics has come crashing through the door, and trampled their boots, all over the usual suspects of , travellers, asylum seekers, migrants, and the rest …….!

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/312109.html

Stonehenge: Further links about it all.

Beanfield Photo Gallery 1 http://tash.gn.apc.org/gal_beanf1.htm
Beanfield Photo Gallery 2 http://tash.gn.apc.org/gal_beanf2.htm

http://tash.dns2go.com/xtra/Beanfield/index.htm

http://tash.dns2go.com/xtra/Beanfield_Exhibition/index.htm

Stonehenge: http://tash.gn.apc.org/stones1.htm
Solstice Ritual: http://tash.gn.apc.org/solst_0.htm
Beanfield: http://tash.gn.apc.org/sh_bean.htm
Injunction Papers: http://tash.gn.apc.org/stonehenge_papers.htm
My cell notes: http://tash.gn.apc.org/sh_bean-notes1.htm
The Story so far: http://tash.gn.apc.org/history.htm
Travellers: http://tash.gn.apc.org/trav1.htm
All Systems: http://tash.gn.apc.org/allsystm.htm

Posted in . | Leave a comment

ID cards to cost £300 per person

Jamie Doward, social affairs editor
Sunday May 29, 2005
The Observer

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,1494944,00.html

The government’s plans to introduce identity cards were dealt a body blow last night after it emerged the true cost of the scheme could top £18 billion, more than triple the official estimate.
The figure has been calculated by experts at the London School of Economics, who have spent months producing one of the most authoritative analyses of the scheme.

Their findings, which will be published in the next two weeks, will be seized upon by critics of the current ID card bill working its way through parliament. It is likely to spark a backbench rebellion from Labour MPs and be taken up by the Tories and Liberal Democrats, who oppose the government’s plans.

Last week the Home Office issued a report which estimated that, over the next decade, the cost of running the scheme, in conjunction with a new biometric passport system, would be £5.8bn. Because the Treasury has insisted the scheme must be self-financing, this works out at an average cost of £93 to each card holder.

But, according to the LSE’s analysis, a draft section of which has been obtained by The Observer, the true cost of implementing and running the scheme, will be between £12bn and £18bn. This could make the average cost of a card as high as £300 to every adult, unless government departments are prepared to shoulder some of the financial burden.

The LSE believes the government has grossly underestimated the cost of the technology involved in making the system work. Last week the government estimated the biometric card readers needed to scan the cards would cost £250-£750. ‘A more likely figure … would be in the range of £3,000 to £4,000 per unit,’ the report suggests.

The report also raises doubts about whether the government is right to assume a 10-year life span for each card. ‘All technical and scientific literature indicates that biometric certainty diminishes over time, and it is therefore likely that a biometric – particularly fingerprints and facial features – will have to be re-scanned at least every five years. This cost must be taken into account.’

A further problem, which the government appears not to have factored in, is ‘refuseniks’ – people who will not co-operate. ‘There is evidence that this population could create a substantial additional cost burden. The administrative costs of handling this group will be substantial,’ the report states.

The LSE also questions the strain placed on the system by individuals notifying a change in their personal circumstances, as they will be required to do so by law.

‘This requirement may result in [between] 300 million and 1.2 billion contacts with the register over 10 years,’ the report says. ‘This additional cost must be taken into account. If human management is necessary to ensure changes are verified, this facet will add between £1bn and £4 bn to the 10-year rollout of the scheme.’

The scheme, which will see some 44 million people issued with a card containing personal details including their name, date of birth and address, is considered controversial because personal details on the central database can be accessed by public sector organisations, without the individual’s consent.

But immigration and asylum minister Tony McNulty defended the plan. ‘A secure compulsory national identity card scheme will help tackle illegal immigration, organised crime, ID fraud, terrorism and will benefit all UK citizens,’ he said.

Opposition parties have expressed concern about the costs of the scheme. Critics have also pointed out that previous government IT projects have run considerably over budget. New systems for the Child Support Agency and the Passport Office were plagued with problems.

But the government has pointed out that it has ‘road-tested’ the combined ID and biometric passport scheme, one of the UK’s most ambitious IT projects, on 10,000 volunteers.

Under the scheme a microchip will hold biometric details including an iris scan, fingerprints and facial image, making it difficult to forge. But the trials revealed significant error rates, raising concerns about its efficacy.

Ministers anticipate that the system will be introduced in a phased roll-out. By 2013 it is expected that it will become compulsory to have an ID card, although holders will not have to carry them at all times. A recent poll showed that half of people questioned believed ID cards were the best weapon in combating identity theft, which is estimated to cost Britain £1.3bn a year.

A spokesman for the Home Office said it was impossible to comment on the LSE’s findings because of the confidential nature of the commercial contracts involved

But the LSE report notes: ‘The ongoing dispute over costs is due in large part to the fact that the government is either not certain exactly what the ID infrastructure will entail, or is unwilling to disclose these details.’

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Nottingham Green Festival, Arboretum Park, Nottingham.

Pictures on my FotoBlog at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=452153

Nottingham Arboretum celebrates the May Bank Holiday with a festival embracing all things green. Live bands, monsters, fun for children and sustainable produce. Stalls, including crafts, plants, local produce, energy conservation demonstrations, wind and solar power, social struggles and human rights issues etc and plenty of other organic, eco-friendly activities.

Arboretum on Sunday 29th May, 12 noon – 6pm, FREE

Nottingham http://www.nottinghamevents.org/arboretum_festival/index.html

also there were some Scary Furry Monsters. Music was being performed, kids playing, people browsing the stalls when all of a sudden, we were confronted by a couple of monsters. They seemed to come out of nowhere!

One had horns, the other exceptionally large eyes, both were multi coloured and very, very furry. Kids ran about in all directions.

A council spokesman stated “he had never seen anything like it”. He had however heard of an outfit called Monster Massive and wondered if it was them. Asked if he had anything else to say, he said “it was very Scary”.

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police at the scene said “he didn’t believe a word of it.

Picture of monsters to be seen at: http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=452049

also

Nottingham Greenweeks

‘Celebrate Sustainability’ in Greater Nottingham by participating in three weeks of special events and activities that link the global to the local.

http://www.greenweeks.org

To give an idea of why looking for some alternatives need to be urgently investigated, check out my earlier post on Indymedia at:

Nottingham Against Incineration and Landfill [NAIL] Protest against expansion
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/05/311559.html

also, I have put up the leaked Draft G8 Climate Change Decisions and Sustainable Energy

http://tash_lodge.blogspot.com/2005/05/draft-g8-climate-change-decisions-and.html

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Scary Furry Monsters Discovered in a Nottingham Park.

Pictures on my FotoBlog at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=452049

There we were, hanging out at the Nottingham Green Festival, held this year for the first time in the Arboretum Park, Nottingham. Music was being performed, kids playing, people browsing the stalls when all of a sudden, we were confronted by a couple of monsters. They seemed to come out of nowhere!

One had horns, the other exceptionally large eyes, both were multi coloured and very, very furry. Kids ran about in all directions.

A council spokesman stated “he had never seen anything like it”. He had however heard of an outfit called Monster Massive and wondered if it was them. Asked if he had anything else to say, he said “it was very Scary”.

A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police at the scene said “he didn’t believe a word of it. However, they had sent the force helicopter with marksmen onboard, just as a precaution you understand……. ”

For further information on Monster Massive, please take a peek at their website at:

http://www.monstermassive.co.uk

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Nottingham Arboretum Festival

The Arboretum, Saturday 28 May, 12pm – 6pm, FREE

Pictures of the event on my FotoBlog at:
http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=450828

Nottingham http://www.nottinghamevents.org/arboretum_festival/index.html

This was a typical, council sponsored, event.

They came, some got entertained, and then they went home. I think community festivals could be so much more. Including more community involvement. Still, what do I know about it ?

This is the council blerb about it:

———–

A great day out at Nottingham’s Arboretum Festival Weekend

Two popular Nottingham festivals have teamed up this year for a Bank Holiday showcase of entertainment, activities, stalls and a chance to learn more about people, the planet and peace.

Nottingham Arboretum Festival on Saturday, May 28 from 12 noon until 6pm features live bands, DJ’s, stalls, street artists and workshops, children’s activities, traditional English folk dance, a brass band, food stalls and lots more. Organisers are delighted to be showcasing local creative talent with Nottingham bands Trickster playing dirty funk/roots/rock, Horny Batacada playing latin/samba/funk, Neon Set playing 60’s psychedelic rock and popular local DJ’s Rick Donohue and Dave Boultbee.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Privacy International Big Brother Awards 2005

The Privacy International’s notorious Big Brother Awards will be happening again from 7.15pm on Thursday 23rd June. Always a chaotic and fun night.

The venue is the Quad of the LSE. Cheap drinks as always, and this year we will be going late into the evening. DJ Rick will be playing the tunes, and we’ll have a quiet area for people who want to relax and chat. Our MC for the evening will be Chris Green, the comic mastermind behind stand-up stage characters Tina C and Ida Barr.

I’m also reliably informed that Darth Vader and a few of his friends will
be making an appearance to collect awards.

E-mail Rick at ukbba@privacy.org for information.

http://www.privacy.org/pi

I won a ‘Winston’ in the first year of the awards in 1998

http://tash.gn.apc.org/big_brother.htm

http://www.jya.com/big-bro98.htm

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Photographer Fay Godwin dies, 74

I rated this ladies work. I thought of her when walking in Wales or the Peak District. Looking through the viewfinder, I found myself frequently thinking, ‘what would Fay do, about this scene’. I’m sad!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/4588595.stm

Photographer Fay Godwin, one of the UK’s most acclaimed landscape and portrait photographers, has died at 74.

Godwin was known for her images of the British countryside as well as portraits of authors such as Ted Hughes and Doris Lessing.

Born in Berlin in 1931, Godwin settled in London in her late 20s.

Paul Hill, professor of photography at De Montfort University, Leicester, and a friend, said she died in Hastings, East Sussex, after a short illness.

“Fay Godwin’s photographs were about the real world and real people, but imaginatively transformed and enhanced by a sensitive, perceptive and often ironic and critical eye,” Prof Hill said.

Godwin won a string of prestigious awards for her work after becoming interested in photography while taking photos of her children.

She was awarded an honorary fellowship of the Royal Photographic Society in 1990 and had a major retrospective at the Barbican Centre in London in 2001.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Draft G8 Climate Change Decisions and Sustainable Energy

Draft G8 Climate Change Decisions and Sustainable Energy text for FASS May 3rd

Our world is warming. Climate change is a serious long-term threat that has the potential to affect every part of the globe. And we know that by increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, mankind’s activities are contributing to this warming. This is an issue we must address now.

At the same time, the world’s energy needs are growing rapidly. Access to secure, reliable and affordable energy sources is fundamentally important for economic stability and growth.

Meeting these energy needs in a sustainable way is one of the greatest long-term challenges we face as a global community.

We have already made a start. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was a landmark agreement. We reaffirm our commitment to the UNFCCC and to its aim, to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.

At Evian and again at Sea Island, we agreed on the need for the G8 to work together to develop innovative clean energy technologies. And there are already many examples of progress at all levels, ranging from the actions of individual companies, to cities and states, to national and international action.

Now, we need to accelerate our efforts. There is a powerful case for urgent action to develop and deploy cleaner and more efficient technologies:

There is now compelling evidence that [statement on scientific evidence of the need for action].

Local air pollution is a serious threat to human health and to ecosystems, particularly in the developing world. Every year, it causes millions of premature deaths, and suffering to millions more through respiratory disease. Through efficiency improvements and cleaner technologies, significant improvements to air quality and major human health benefits are possible.

Diverse and reliable energy supplies are essential to economic growth. Security of energy supply is a major concern to us all, particularly at this time of higher energy prices. We need to work together to make the most efficient use of our existing energy resources, and to shift to new, non-fossil fuel sources of energy.

Access to energy is essential for economic development, poverty alleviation and quality of life. Innovations in technology offer the potential to provide energy even to remote communities both sustainably and at a competitive cost.

Climate variability and natural disasters already seriously undermine economic development and political stability. Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, threatening future economic growth and human security.

Clear and early signals about the direction of policy from governments, and stable long-term policy frameworks, can promote innovation and provide the private sector with the confidence it needs to invest in cleaner technologies, minimising the costs of adjustment.

We now face a moment of opportunity. Some $16 trillion will be invested in the world’s energy systems over the next 25 years. If through our combined efforts, a growing share of this investment can be directed towards cleaner technologies, then we have a real hope of transforming our energy systems.

If we miss this opportunity and fail to give a clear sense of direction, then we will be locked into an unsustainable future that will threaten our long-term security and prosperity.

The world’s developed economies have a responsibility to lead this agenda, and to work in partnership with the developing world to support strong and sustainable economic growth. The G8 therefore pledge to take action to promote a fundamental step change in the way we produce and use energy.

We will improve the policy, regulatory and financing environment for clean energy technologies, to support rapid deployment and encourage private investment. We will implement new measures to promote research and development. We will encourage businesses and consumers to consider the energy implications of their choices. And we will promote the transfer of technologies to developing countries, taking into account their own energy needs and priorities.

These actions will demonstrate that we are united in our aim of achieving substantial greenhouse gas reductions and moving towards a low-carbon global economy.

We also need to consider how we deal with the impacts of our changing climate. Many developing countries already struggle to cope with existing climate variability and are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change. We are concerned that the long-term effects of climate change may threaten the very existence of some small island developing States. We therefore pledge to take steps to improve the resilience of the world’s most vulnerable countries to the risks of further climate change.

Tackling climate change, and promoting clean technologies, is a challenge that will require our concerted efforts over a sustained period. [To be added: section on implementation / follow-up]

Programme of Action on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy
We agree to take forward actions in the following key areas:

Transforming the way we use energy

Powering a cleaner future

Promoting research and development

Financing the transition to cleaner energy

Managing the impact of climate change

Transforming the way we use energy
Improvements to energy efficiency are the lowest cost way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. They often pay for themselves, saving money and conserve scarce energy resources. Already, progress has been made. Today, IEA countries emit only half the amount of CO2 per unit of GDP that they did thirty years ago, and energy efficiency technologies accounted for 80% of that reduction. However, the rate of energy efficiency improvement has slowed in the last 15 years – we need to create a further step change in the efficiency of our economies.

Energy efficiency is also a key issue for many non-IEA countries. We note, for instance, that China has an aspiration to halve the energy intensity of its economy by 2020.

At Evian, we agreed that energy efficiency is a key area for G8 action. And following agreement at the Sea Island Summit in 2004, the 3Rs initiative was launched in Japan this year – an important step towards encouraging more efficient use of resources and materials, which increases economic competitiveness whilst decreasing environmental impacts.

Transforming the way we use energy: Buildings
Energy consumption associated with buildings accounts for almost half of total final energy consumption in some G8 countries. Improving the energy efficiency of our existing building stock and raising standards for new build will deliver significant energy savings and lower operating costs.

Examples of action by G8 nations include implementation of the EU Buildings Directive, which lays down requirements for minimum standards for energy performance of buildings, and the home retrofit programme in Canada, which provides advice and financing to home owners to make their homes more energy efficient.

G8 Commitments

We will improve the efficiency of our building stock by:

Setting ambitious targets and timetables for reducing carbon emissions from the non-domestic public buildings we procure in our countries, reporting back to the G8 Summit in [2007]

Inviting the International Energy Agency (IEA) to lead a programme on transforming the market for energy efficient buildings. To do this we ask the IEA to:

undertake a study to review existing global building standards and codes

use its analysis to develop and implement a programme to promote the transformation of the market for the G8 and other interested countries

submit a progress report to the G8 in [2006]

develop a Technical Assistance Facility to assist in the development of better policy frameworks for buildings in developing countries

Transforming the way we use energy: Appliances
Residential appliances and equipment use 30% of all electricity generated in OECD countries. We should ensure that appliances on the market are designed to minimise energy use. In particular, we should look for opportunities to address the high levels of energy consumption from appliances on standby: across the G8, standby power consumes the equivalent of the output of twenty full-scale power stations.

G8 Commitments

Recognising that innovation in energy efficiency will be encouraged by coherent international policies on labelling and standards, G8 countries agree to:

Fully endorse the IEA’s 1 Watt Initiative, and pledge to support the IEA in establishing frameworks for reporting on these commitments by G8 countries

Publish, through the IEA, their national priorities, product standards and participation in co-operative initiatives

Work nationally and in co-operation with other countries to improve the environmental performance of products in priority sectors, including through the UN Marrakech process

Explore the potential for further co-ordination of standards, including with non-G8 countries

Transforming the way we use energy: Road transport
Transport energy use is expected to nearly double worldwide by 2030. However, improvements in fuel efficiency and new technologies offer the opportunity to reduce both local and global pollutants. Policies such as vehicle labelling and tax incentives can encourage consumers to take up these technologies.

G8 Commitments

We agree to take actions to develop and promote the uptake of cleaner vehicles, by:

Setting ambitious targets and timetables for future sales of clean, low carbon vehicles in our countries and consider similar targets for the public procurement of these vehicles

Raising consumer awareness of the environmental impact of their vehicle choices. We will support initiatives such as the energy efficiency labelling of new cars, and where possible we will develop plans for the introduction of energy efficiency labels in our own countries

Agreeing to co-operate on technology development in areas including hydrogen vehicles, battery performance, and cleaner fuels including biofuels, with a view to making improvements in greenhouse gas emissions and local air quality

Welcoming the United Kingdom’s initiative in hosting an international environmentally friendly vehicles conference in November as part of its G8 Presidency, following up on a previous Japanese event, and calling on all countries to attend and contribute to it at a high level

Transforming the way we use energy: Aviation
Aviation makes a significant and rising contribution to emissions of both local and global pollutants, although improvements in technology and in operational issues have the potential to limit emissions growth. In 1999 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change published a Special Report on Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, which is the seminal work on aviation climate science; there would be great benefit from updating this work to take into account recent research.

G8 Commitments

The G8 commit to:

Undertake a programme of collaborative work to explore and accelerate the potential for operational advances that will improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions in air transport

Commission [organisation] to conduct an assessment of the latest scientific understanding of aviation’s impacts on the climate

Provide [$X] for additional climate science research, aimed at improving our understanding of specific issues such as contrails and cirrus cloud effects, with the intention of using this to inform technological and operational responses

Work to co-ordinate our existing national research programmes on long-term technologies

Transforming the way we use energy: Industry
Each year commercial banks and international financial institutions (IFIs) invest, lend, mobilise or support capital expenditure valued at billions of dollars in a range of industrial and power projects. Commercial banks and IFIs are ideally placed to help their clients to reduce energy consumption, thereby cutting costs and emissions, and offering the potential for carbon credit sales under the Kyoto mechanisms.

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, for instance, has introduced an energy savings assessment for investments in energy intensive sectors as part of their credit approval process. Although client action on the results of the assessments is completely voluntary, the rate of client uptake of audit recommendations is around 80%.

There is also significant value in benchmarking the energy efficiency performance of different technologies in key sectors. Making this type of information widely available is a powerful way to promote the take-up of more efficient technologies.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Call on the Multilateral Development Banks to conduct energy savings assessments for all investments in new or expansion projects in energy intensive sectors, drawing on a [$X] fund to be established by the G8 for this purpose

Call on Export Credit Agencies to promote awareness of this facility among project developers

Invite the IEA to carry out an initial analysis of energy efficiency measures, technologies and national policies, globally on a sector by sector basis, covering industrial efficiency, buildings, appliances, and vehicles

Establish a clearing house open to all nations that contains information on available technologies, best practices and national policies to encourage deployment of energy efficiency technologies

Powering a Cleaner Future
Reliable and affordable energy supplies are essential for strong economic growth, both in the G8 countries and in the rest of the world. Access to energy is also critical for poverty alleviation: in the developing world, 2 billion people lack access to modern energy services.

We commit to taking action to improve the efficiency of energy generation and transmission, and to maximise the potential of alternative sources of energy. We will also work to ensure that these technologies are made accessible to the developing world.

We focus particularly here on actions around the cleaner use of fossil fuels and on renewable power, as well as issues around transmission. [Statement on nuclear power, to be added following discussions].

We express our support for research into the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier, and of the work of the International Partnership for the Hydrogen Economy in co-ordinating research efforts in this area.

Powering a cleaner future: Cleaner Fossil Fuels
Improving the efficiency of fossil fuel generation
The world has substantial reserves of coal, and this fuel will continue to be an important part of the global energy mix in the coming decades. However, coal power generation generates the highest greenhouse gas emissions of all power generation options, approximately twice that of gas power generation. There are also impacts on human health, through local air pollution and through the safety risks associated with coal extraction.

There is considerable scope to reduce emissions from coal plants by ensuring that existing plant operates to its best potential, and by encouraging the transfer and uptake of new high-efficiency technologies, which need to be made available at an economic cost. Many of these measures also have the potential to be applied to gas and oil generation.

G8 Commitments

We will support the efficient operation of existing and new power plants by:

Working with the IEA to hold workshops in major coal using economies to review and share experiences of bilateral work on energy efficiency assessments for power plants, and to recommend options to make best practice more accessible.

Contributing to a [$X] fund to follow up on the workshops for a programme of further assessments and dissemination, co-ordinated by the IEA, and building on existing programmes

Calling on the IEA to carry out a benchmarking study of recently constructed plants, assessing which have the highest efficiencies and lowest emissions, and to disseminate this information widely, with a view to helping decision makers understand the benefits of new higher-efficiency technologies

Implementing a programme of projects to demonstrate the potential of advanced technologies

Supporting the World Bank/IFC review of existing environmental guidelines for new build power projects, and encouraging them to include a stronger reference to greenhouse gas emissions, alongside references to other pollutants

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
Capturing and storing the carbon dioxide emitted from fossil fuel power generation has the potential for emissions reductions on a very large scale. But many technical, economic and public acceptance issues are yet to be resolved.

The CSLF (Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum), a US initiative, is the major international co-ordinating forum for research into this technology.

G8 Commitments

We agree to accelerate the development of CCS technology by:

Agreeing to fund a [$X] collaborative research programme to determine the viability of geological CO2 storage in developing countries

Inviting the IEA to undertake an urgent study on definitions, costs, scope and regulatory options for ‘capture ready’ plant, with a view to establishing the feasibility of aiming to build all new coal plants in a way which leaves open the option of retrofitting CCS in the future

Implementing a programme of projects to demonstrate the potential of CCS technologies, to include demonstrating “capture ready” plant in a developing country

Endorsing the objectives and activities of the Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum, and agreeing to expand the work of Forum to work with broader civil society to address the barriers to the public acceptability of CCS technology, and to look at how planning and regulatory frameworks can be strengthened

Capturing energy from methane
Methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, is the major component of natural gas, and losses from natural gas systems account for an estimated 16% of worldwide methane emissions. If this gas could be used rather than wasted, there would be significant benefits for energy supply and emissions reductions. Coalbed methane is a further potential source of energy.

The World Bank hosts a major international partnership on gas flaring called the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR). In addition, the US leads the Methane-to-Markets Partnership focusing on advancing cost-effective, near-term methane recovery and use as a clean energy source.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Express our support for the Methane to Markets initiative and the World Bank Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership, and encourage expanded participation of all interested nations and of stakeholders

Work through the Bank to extend the GGFR Partnership beyond 2006

Powering a cleaner future: Renewable Power
Renewables have an important role in the future energy mix. The IEA estimate that, with the right policies in place, renewables could account for 32% of electricity generation by 2050. The G8 challenge is level the playing field with conventional technologies, and to reduce costs so that they become economically viable in both developed and developing countries.

Bioenergy has significant potential to contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as well as providing a range of other benefits, including access to cleaner and reliable energy services for the poor, sustainable agriculture and land use, and waste management. There is significant potential to share experience, particularly from the developing world: Brazil, in particular, has developed a successful bioenergy industry. [Add reference to conclusions of Italian conference on bioenergy]

G8 Commitments

We will support the development of renewable energy by:

Creating a Review Mechanism to monitor the global uptake of renewable energy and to promote the achievement of Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and Bonn International Action Programme on Renewable Energy, starting with a Conference at the end of 2005, hosted by the Chinese government

[Subject to the forthcoming Italian conference]: Launching a major international Global Bioenergy Partnership as an ongoing effort to support wider biomass and biofuels deployment. In this partnership, we will work with developing countries on sharing best practice and case studies in biomass energy use, application, financing and national policy frameworks, including environmental safeguards.

Providing [$X] to [the Partnership? – to be confirmed] to enable developing countries to build capacity, undertake R&D and assess opportunities for bioenergy

Powering a cleaner future: Electricity Grids
As well as changes to the way power is generated, there may need to be changes to the way power is transmitted. The growth of renewable and distributed generation technologies represent fresh challenges that the electricity networks of tomorrow will need to accommodate.

G8 Commitments

Today we agree to:

Commission the IEA to draw together research into the problems of integrating renewable energy sources into networks, and produce a report for G8 governments, which would be discussed at a conference in late 2006

Work with the IEA to identify and link “Centres of Excellence” to promote research and development in the developed and developing world

Promote workshops during 2006/07 aimed at overcoming technical, regulatory and commercial issues

Promoting research and development
We recognise the need to achieve faster progress in R&D and encourage full participation by developing countries. This means identifying challenges along the path for individual technologies, and adopting goals to move them further and faster.

Promoting research and development: R&D networks
There is a vast amount of research work across the field of energy technologies globally. There is clearly value to be had in joining up our efforts.

G8 Commitments

[Subject to outcomes of the WIRE meeting: We take note of the outcomes of the Energy Research and Innovation Workshop held in Oxford in May 2005, and agree to:

Create a global virtual network to identify energy research areas of common interest and facilitate ongoing cooperation

Set up and contribute to a global repository of energy research findings

Establish a [$X] fund to enable developing countries to participate in relevant international research projects.]

Promoting research and development: International ‘Carbon Challenge’ Prize
There exist several areas in which traditional funding streams are failing and increased momentum could usefully be added. Prizes have been shown to raise the level of research into particular areas where other incentives may fail.

Russia currently administers an annual Global Energy International Prize that rewards scientists and researchers that have made significant advances in the field of energy production or conservation.

G8 Commitments

We acknowledge the value of the Russian prize in raising the awareness of the importance of energy research, and agree:

To build on this with a [$X] G8 prize fund, administered by the IEA, to encourage new technology research achievements that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Financing the transition to cleaner energy
The IEA estimates that $16 trillion will be invested in energy infrastructure worldwide before 2030. We believe that there is now a real opportunity now to shift a growing share of this investment towards cleaner energy technologies.

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: IFI and Export Credit Agency financing for clean technology
International financial institutions such as the World Bank are well placed to provide their clients with advice on improving their energy consumption. The World Bank has already announced that it would be committing to an average growth rate of 20 percent per year over the next five years for lending on renewable energy and energy efficiency projects. The G8 believes that the IFIs can do more to highlight the benefits of cleaner technologies to clients and increase their uptake, without imposing new conditionality.

In addition, Export Credit Agencies could have a key role in assisting in the deployment of renewable energy systems, if the higher upfront costs, longer payback periods and greater perceived risks associated with these projects can be addressed. Already, progress is being made, with the recent OECD agreement to extend credit terms for renewable energy projects to 15 years, in line with current provisions for nuclear power.

G8 Commitments

We agree:

To call on the World Bank to increase the share of total energy sector investments made on lower carbon and energy efficiency technologies beyond existing targets

To further call on the World Bank to ensure that ‘lower-carbon’ development options are integrated into its Country Assistance Strategies for countries with the highest predicted energy requirements

To encourage the multilateral development banks to establish policy dialogues with borrower countries to look at how the economic incentives of energy suppliers and consumers can be better aligned with the efficient production and use of energy

[To be added: IFI initiative on new financing platform for clean technologies]

To support a successful replenishment of the GEF this year, and to encourage the GEF to examine how market based carbon finance mechanisms can be better harnessed in the deployment of clean energy technologies

That our Export Credit Agencies should work to lower the cost of capital for cleaner energy projects, increase the low carbon energy percentage of their portfolios, create favourable provisions for low carbon technologies and lift the ceiling for local content

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: Emissions Trading and Offset Mechanisms
Emissions trading schemes and offset mechanisms are an effective tool to find least-cost reductions in emissions of key pollutants. By providing a clear and sustained price signal to business and long-term policy certainty, they have the potential to mobilise significant investment. Consistency in the core design features of different schemes is important to reduce costs to business, and to facilitate links between schemes to increase market liquidity.

The US pioneered emissions trading with a sulphur dioxide trading scheme in 1995. The EU Emissions Trading Scheme is the world’s first comprehensive carbon trading scheme. Preparations are already underway for a scheme in Canada, and are under consideration in Japan and Russia.

G8 Commitments

We agree to:

Promote a multi-stakeholder dialogue on the technical aspects of emissions trading for carbon and for other pollutants, in order to build institutional capacity, share best practice and identify opportunities at local, regional and national levels for enhancing schemes’ compatibility to facilitate linking, with the aim of exploring ways to creating deep and liquid trading markets for emissions quotas

Those of us who have ratified the Kyoto Protocol confirm that we attach great importance to the successful operation of the flexible mechanisms (Joint Implementation and the Clean Development Mechanism), and undertake to work together to strengthen the implementation of these. As a first step, we pledge [$X] by the end of 2005 to improve the funding of the CDM Executive Board

Financing the transition to cleaner energy: Capacity building for policy, regulatory and financial issues
Policy, regulatory and financing frameworks need to be developed to provide a commercially attractive balance of risk and reward to private investors. Organisations such as UNEP, the UNDP and IEA, and initiatives such as the Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP), MEDREP, and REN21, are already doing important work in this area, which the G8 can build on.

G8 Commitments

We recognise the need to establish solid policy, regulatory and financial frameworks, particularly in the developing countries, and agree:

To commit [$X] million to fund the post-Johannesburg partnerships to develop a facility dedicated to the development of markets in sustainable energy in the major developing countries, including the facilitation of innovative finance models

Managing the impact of climate change
We recognise that some degree of climate change is already happening, and that even with concerted efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, further changes are inevitable given the inertia in our climate system.

Potential risks include increased frequency of droughts and floods, economic damage to agriculture and infrastructure, water stress, health impacts, and risks to coastal populations due to sea level rises. The February 2005 UK conference in Exeter on “Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change” provided an up-to-date assessment of the scientific evidence on these and other impacts.

The adverse effects of climate change present significant risks to sustainable growth and development, and could undermine the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals.

Managing the impact of climate change: Risk Management
Development activities in relevant sectors (such as agriculture and infrastructure) need to take into account the potential impact of future climate risks. In some cases, climate-risk will be negligible, while in others it could be potentially significant. A systematic approach for distinguishing between such cases is required, so that development activities can be adapted, if necessary, at the discretion of the lender-borrower.

G8 Commitments

We look forward to further discussions on how development strategies can be strengthened to build national resistance to climate impacts, including at the Millennium Review Summit in September 2005, and agree to:

Invite the World Bank to develop and implement ‘best practice’ guidelines for screening its development portfolio for climate risks, as well as how best to manage those risks, in consultation with local communities. We call on the Bank to have these guidelines ready by the end of 2006

Invite other major multilateral and bilateral development organisations to develop and implement equivalent guidelines, and to report back on progress in 2007

Managing the impact of climate change: Africa
Africa is already vulnerable to climate variability and, like many developing countries, is now starting to experience the impacts of climate change. There is a particular need for Africa to develop the scientific capacity that will allow governments to integrate climate factors into development planning and resilience strategies.

The G8 agreed at Evian to strengthen international cooperation on global Earth observations. This is being taken forward through the development of a coordinating framework (GEOSS or Global Earth Observations System of Systems).

G8 Commitments

We will continue to exercise leadership in the area of Earth observation, and agree to:

Provide [$X] to strengthen the Regional Climate Outlook Forums (RCOF) in Africa, through the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS), with a view to developing fully operational regional climate centres in Africa

Invite these regional climate centres to report on progress made to the Board of GCOS in 2007

Posted on this chaps blog: http://carroll.org.uk

I have also included the original .PDF Do take a peek.

and you can be updated on comments to this, using his ‘feed’ at:

http://carroll.org.uk/archives/2005/05/25/leaked-g8-draft-climate-decisions/feed

Posted in . | Leave a comment