None ought to be lord over another
but the earth be free for everyone to live on.
Garrard Winstanley 1649
None ought to be lord over another
but the earth be free for everyone to live on.
Garrard Winstanley 1649
If not now, WHEN?
If not here, WHERE?
If not you, WHO?
An Extinction Rebellion gathering outside the County Coucil Offices at Trent Bridge, NottinghamThe ‘climate camp’ set up to highlight and protest at the Nottinghamshire Local Government Pension Fund for not divesting their funds from outfits involved in extractions and use of fossil fuels.The fund has 47,000 local members and holds an estimated £170m in fossil fuel company shares. It has no investments in sustainable or low carbon share funds, despite many being available to it to invest in.XR say that this must change.
Extinction Rebellion – Nottingham https://xrnottingham.org
https://xrnottingham.org/divestnotts
My pictures report at : https://www.facebook.com/tashuk/posts/10158457537701799
I am registered for the mixed vaccine trials, to try and find out with other enrolling participants who have received the first dose of either the Oxford-AstraZeneca, or Pfizer vaccine, to then be randomly allocated to receive either the same vaccine for their second dose, or a dose of the COVID-19 vaccines produced by Moderna or Novavax. The aim of this study is to determine whether combinations of safe and effective vaccine doses can be used flexibly and support the current vaccine rollout.
COVID-19 Vaccine Research Registry Newsletter April 2021
Dear Alan Lodge
Welcome to the NHS COVID-19 Vaccine Research Registry April newsletter from the Vaccine Taskforce. In this month’s issue, you will discover news of the latest vaccine studies to launch in the UK and how studies are offering crossover appointments to ensure all study participants now receive an active vaccine dose. We hope you find it helpful and interesting. Professor Andrew Ustianowski, National Clinical Lead for the UK NIHR COVID Vaccine Research ProgrammeSince you read our last COVID-19 Vaccine Research Registry newsletter, there have been a number of new vaccine study launches and key updates to studies currently running across the UK. As we have seen through the national vaccine rollout, it is clear that we need a number of different approved vaccine options to ensure we can carry on protecting the country against coronavirus.Earlier this month, Moderna became the third coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out in the UK, following the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca jabs. While the number of those vaccinated continues to grow and more COVID-19 deaths are prevented, and as lockdown restrictions begin to ease, clinical research into several more vaccine candidates remains a key focus at the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the local Clinical Research Networks which deliver these important studies.For those who have received both doses of their COVID-19 vaccines, there will still be opportunities to join studies in the near future. Vaccine studies investigating booster vaccines and third doses are currently in set-up stages within the NIHR, and will help us gain a better understanding of possible future COVID-19 vaccine schedules. We will update on the progress of these studies through this newsletter. Your interest and engagement in these studies when they are ready to recruit will play a key role.If you are one of those who have received their first dose of your COVID-19 vaccine, and are awaiting your second dose, you can still help play an important part in vaccine research. One of the most recent COVID-19 vaccine studies to launch, Com-Cov2, is enrolling participants who have received the first dose of either the Oxford-AstraZeneca, or Pfizer vaccine, to then be randomly allocated to receive either the same vaccine for their second dose, or a dose of the COVID-19 vaccines produced by Moderna or Novavax. The aim of this study is to determine whether combinations of safe and effective vaccine doses can be used flexibly and support the current vaccine rollout. Please respond to your study email invitation if it arrives in your inbox.Below you can find out more about the latest vaccine studies to be launched within the UK and what makes these trials unique and key to our defence against the virus. As more people receive their vaccinations, some studies have needed to tweak their protocols to ensure research participants aren’t disadvantaged and are offered the same level of protection as to those receiving approved vaccines. This “crossover” process allows study volunteers to receive a licensed vaccine through the study they are enrolled on, without being unblinded. This allows researchers to gain the best possible data from each study to help identify more effective vaccines. More information on crossover appointments and unblinding can be found at the bottom of this newsletter and on the Latest vaccine news page on the Be Part of Research website. As ever, both your involvement and interest in COVID-19 research is greatly appreciated, and paramount to helping researchers discover further effective vaccines and treatments. Valneva Phase 1/2 Study Shows Early Positive Results The Valneva Phase 1/2 clinical trial has reported positive data for their COVID-19 vaccine candidate, VLA2001, with no safety concerns identified. It is the only study examining a whole virus, inactivated, adjuvanted vaccine candidate in clinical trials against COVID-19 in Europe.Supported by NIHR, 153 healthy adults were recruited across four sites in Birmingham, Bristol, Newcastle and Southampton. Subject to Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) regulatory approval, Valneva plans to progress expeditiously into Phase 3 clinical development. Further details of volunteer enrolment will follow soon, so if you receive an invitation for the Phase 3 clinical trials, please do participate. Medicago Launches COVID-19 Vaccine Study in the UK Last week, the Medicago COVID-19 vaccine study launched at several sites across the UK.Medicago, a biopharmaceutical company based in Canada, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) are launching the Phase 3 randomised, observer blinded, placebo-controlled study. The NIHR-supported study is the first to test a plant-derived COVID-19 vaccine candidate, and will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Coronavirus-Like Particle COVID-19 Vaccine (CoVLP).1,500 volunteers will be recruited to the study within the UK, and each will receive an active study vaccine dose as part of the trial’s blinded crossover design. Healthy adults between the age of 18 to 39-year-old will be asked to take part in the study, which will look to recruit over the course of the next four to six weeks.Email invitations are being sent via the COVID-19 Vaccine Research Registry, to those who meet the eligibility and area catchment criteria. Alternating vaccines study expands to include two additional vaccines Researchers running the Com-Cov study, launched in February to investigate alternating doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine and the Pfizer vaccine, have announced the programme will be extended to include the Moderna and Novavax vaccines in a new study, Com-Cov2.Led by the University of Oxford, run across nine NIHR supported sites by the National Immunisation Schedule Evaluation Consortium, and backed through funding from the Vaccines Taskforce and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the additional study will seek to recruit adults aged over 50 who have received their first, or ‘prime’ vaccination in the past 8-12 weeks.There are expected to be 1050 volunteers across nine different sites in the trial, including: St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust The University of Nottingham Health Service Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Find out more about the study by reading the full University of Oxford press release. Volunteers needed for study looking into whether COVID-19 and flu vaccines can be administered at the same time Researchers at the Bristol Trials Centre (CTEU) at the University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (UHBW) are leading a new study which could set the foundations for how booster COVID-19 vaccinations are delivered in the future. The study, supported by the NIHR, will determine whether booster COVID-19 vaccines should be given at the same time as flu vaccines.While there are vaccines that have been approved to protect against COVID-19 in the UK, it is not yet known whether further booster doses may be required to give continued protection, and how giving boosters might fit in with the seasonal flu jab programme.From 29 March 2021, a study will look at the side effects and immune response given when people receive their COVID-19 booster and flu vaccine at the same appointment.To find out more, read the full news story. GenOMICC COVID-19 Study Volunteers Needed If you have had COVID-19, you can join the GenOMICC COVID-19 Study, which analyses the genes of people who have had the virus to discover why some experienced no symptoms while others became extremely ill is appealing for more volunteers.“We’re issuing an urgent appeal for more volunteers from all walks of life – and in particular for people from ethnic minority communities – to come forward and register as soon as possible,” explains Dr Kenneth Baillie, the study’s Chief Investigator. “We need to find people who tested positive for COVID but experienced either mild or no symptoms and didn’t require hospital treatment.”Scientists urgently need to recruit more people from all backgrounds – since many of the people who became really unwell were older, male or came from an ethnic minority we especially need to find people like them who had milder symptoms to join the study. Find out more by watching a short study animation. Volunteers can register online here. NHS COVID-19 vaccine research registry in numbers Up to date data can be found on the public dashboard including geographical breakdown of registrants. Be Part of Research Vaccine FAQs Check out the COVID-19 vaccines frequently asked questions page on our Be Part of Research website. Here you will find a number of FAQs that we are asked by members of the public. Some of the information might help answer your own questions too. The areas we are most commonly asked about are around:What is the advice for participants on trials who are offered a deployed vaccine?Participants on some vaccine trials may have been offered an active vaccine or a placebo (that offers no protection against COVID-19). Now approved vaccines are available from the NHS, we want to make sure participants are not put at a disadvantage, and are able to have protection as quickly as possible, while still gathering important data on the effectiveness of the trial vaccines. Arrangements are being put in place so that all participants can receive an active vaccine, together with extra monitoring in the trial environment. The trial team will be able to collect further data that will help demonstrate effectiveness. This is being done through a crossover trial appointment. The crossover trial will offer you the active vaccine being tested on your trial, and will be provided through the trial team rather than the normal NHS vaccine deployment.How does the crossover phase of a trial work?If you are already enrolled in a study, at your next trial visit (or sooner if you have already been offered the deployed vaccine), you will be offered an active vaccine if you received the placebo (dummy vaccine) initially. The trial team will contact you to offer you an appointment. If you are not called before you are offered a deployed vaccine, you can contact the trial team.Will supply of vaccines for the crossover trial be affected by any shortages affecting the national deployment?No, there are dedicated vaccine supplies for the crossover trial. You would not be affected by any shortages of supply affecting the national scheme. Welsh Version You can find this newsletter in Welsh. Withdraw your permissionIf you change your mind and would like to withdraw your permission to be contacted by researchers and NHS Digital about approved coronavirus vaccine studies, you can withdraw your permission on the Service website at any time. The sign-up service is delivered in partnership between the National Institute for Health Research and NHS Digital. The NIHR is working with equivalent NHS research partners in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales.
The Guardian has removed 3 very recent articles apparently by order of a judge for ‘contempt of court’.
The story in the first removed article is about a letter signed by more than 400 Scientists and academics which states that they believe:
“Peaceful environmental protesters are being threatened, silenced and criminalised in countries around the world including the UK and the US”.
So to show contempt for the judge, the 3 articles are still available here:
..and one easier to display version here:
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/environment-protest-being-criminalised-around-world-say-experts/ar-BB1fOMSv
Peaceful environmental protesters are being threatened, silenced and criminalised in countries around the world including the UK and the US, according to some of the world’s leading climate scientists and academics.© Provided by The Guardian Photograph: Barcroft Media/Getty Images
More than 400 leading experts – including 14 authors from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – say that non-violent civil disobedience from groups like the school strikers, Extinction Rebellion and the Sunrise Movement have transformed the debate around the climate crisis in recent years.
But in an open letter published on Monday they warn governments around the world are criminalising them at a pivotal time in the fight to tackle the escalating climate emergency.
“We know that our research alone was not enough for this recent awakening to climate breakdown as an existential crisis for humanity, and recognise that protest movements around the world have raised the alarm,” the letter states, adding: “Those who put their voices and bodies on the line to raise the alarm are being threatened and silenced by the very countries they seek to protect..”
In the UK, more than 2,000 people who took part in Extinction Rebellion protests are being taken through the court system in what experts say is one of the biggest crackdowns on protest in British legal history. The scientists also raise concern about efforts to silence climate protests in other parts of the world from the US to France, the Philippines to India.
Dr Oscar Berglund, from the Cabot Institute for the Environment at the University of Bristol, helped coordinate the letter. He said the attempt to “criminalise climate protest” was central to the fossil fuel industry’s new strategy of delaying action on climate change.
“Now that climate change denialism is in steep decline, they have put their money behind efforts to stifle dissent. Climate scientists, who have been subject to the slander of the fossil fuel lobby for so long, recognise this change in strategy.”
The letter is signed by 429 scientists and academics from 32 countries, including leading figures such as Michael Mann and more than 70 other professors. It is also backed by three lead authors and 11 contributing authors on the UN’s IPCC reports.
The experts warn that just months before a crucial global climate conference due to be held in Glasgow later this year, it is more important than ever that these groups are able to put pressure on politicians and highlight the role polluting corporations are playing in the escalating ecological crisis.
The letter states: “It has become abundantly clear that governments don’t act on climate without pressure from civil society: threatening and silencing activists thus seems to be a new form of anti-democratic refusal to act on climate … [we] therefore urge all governments, courts and legislative bodies around the world to halt and reverse attempts to criminalise nonviolent climate protest.”
Prof Julia Steinberger, a lead author with the IPCC who signed the letter, said governments had ignored scientists and the urgency of the climate crisis by claiming climate action was not politically popular.
She added “Thanks to the alarm raised by climate activists, this has changed – but instead of acting, many governments are choosing to shoot the messenger, by criminalising nonviolent protest. As scientists, we have a duty to stand with the activists who are paying attention to the science, rather than these governments, who seem to be more swayed by powerful economic interests than by the life chances of their own citizens.”© Photograph: Barcroft Media/Getty Images Activists from Extinction Rebellion lie on the ground after being arrested in Parliament Square following a march through central London in September 2020.
Dear Alan Lodge,
Parliament debated the petition you signed – “Don’t criminalise trespass”
Watch the debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwYCeJ–zp4
Read the transcript: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-04-19/debates/B2678378-7AE5-419D-AB02-71BD15388BB0/Trespass
Read the research: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn05116/
The petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300139
Thanks,
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament
The Petitions Committee has scheduled a debate on e-petition 300139 relating to trespass. Katherine Fletcher, member of the Petitions Committee, will open the debate. The Government will send a Minister to respond. Read the petition: https://petition.parliament.uk/petiti… Find petitions you agree with, and sign them: https://petition.parliament.uk/ What are petitions debates? Petitions debates are ‘general’ debates which allow MPs from all parties to discuss the important issues raised by one or more petitions, and put their concerns to Government Ministers. Stay up-to-date Follow the Committee on Twitter for real-time updates on its work: https://www.twitter.com/hocpetitions
“A good police force is one that catches more crooks than it employs,”
Sir Robert Mark
Metropolitan Police commissioner 1972
Undercover officers’ sexual relationships encouraged or tolerated, tribunal told
By Press Association 2021
“…. In 2003, the NPIOU sent Kennedy to infiltrate the Sumac Centre, a community centre in Nottingham, which it said was “used by persons involved in extremism relating to animal rights, environmentalism, anarchy, anti-weapons and war issues and anti-globalisation”, the tribunal heard.
Ms Kilroy said: “In truth, it was a community space with a vegan cafe used by a wide range of people and groups.”
Kennedy was “told to develop personal relationships in order to gather pre-emptive intelligence” on activists at the centre, with the help of “an extensive support system for the purpose of this long-term infiltration”, Ms Kilroy said.
He had “police-issued phones, laptops, passport and bank cards”, all in his false identity, and “had a police-issued van and a flat paid for by the police”, Ms Kilroy added”.
Nadia Whittome MP nadia.whittome.mp@parliament.uk
(Case Ref: NW4149)
Dear Alan Lodge,
Thank you for this information about the Police Crime Sentencing and Courts Bill. As I am sure you will appreciate, I have received a vast amount of correspondence on this issue, so I wanted to inform you of my opinions and the actions I am taking on behalf of my constituents on this matter.
The tragedy of Sarah Everard’s disappearance and murder has rightly sparked conversations about policing and gender based violence and my thoughts and heartfelt condolences go out to her friends and family. Women have a right to be safe from violence, to walk home at night and not have their lives cut short.
The Government has used this tragedy as a justification for rushing through The Police Crime Sentencing and Courts Bill under the guise of protecting women. The Bill does not protect women, in fact there is more protection afforded to statues in this Bill than to living women. It does however represent the next step on our descent into authoritarianism. Born out of the Home Secretary’s fury at the Black Lives Matter movement and Extinction Rebellion, the Bill constitutes the biggest assault on our right to protest in recent history and moves to criminalise Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities.
The police reaction to the vigils held in Sarah’s honour only further highlight the danger that this bill poses. I spoke in the House of Commons Chamber to highlight my objection to the Bill and its problematic nature. This Bill represents an expansion in police powers that should not be seen in any modern democracy. Were this legislation being debated in another country, I have no doubt that MPs from across Parliament would be condemning that country as an authoritarian regime. The right to protest is a fundamental human right and one of the only ways to challenge establishment power. Demonstrations are by their nature noisy, the concept of ‘serious annoyance’ is subjective and I am extremely concerned that this Bill aims to shut down legitimate forms of protest.
The Bill also poses a huge threat to the nomadic existence and traditions of the Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities. Changing trespass from a civil offence to a criminal one as this Bill proposes, would give police the power to arrest, imprison, fine and seize vehicles. The Government says that the proposals only intend to tackle those living on roadside camps causing anti-social behaviour, however I am concerned at how this will be interpreted and the impact this will have on travelling communities. Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities have already been failed by the Government due to the lack of sufficient stopping sites and this absence leaves them with nowhere that they are permitted to stop. Ingrained racism and prejudice against Gypsies, Roma and Travellers already causes them significant difficulties and hardship without their very existence being criminalised, and this will no doubt impact enforcement of the powers in the Bill.
For these reasons, the Bill must be actively opposed. I and my Labour colleagues voted against the Bill when it last came to the House of Commons, but the fight against this Bill continues. I supported my colleague Bell Ribeiro-Addy’s reasoned amendment to have the Bill thrown out of the House of Commons and I have been vocal in my opposition of this bill and the threat to our human rights that it represents, I have attended and spoken at the protests outside of parliament and I will continue to campaign on this issue until the Bill is no more.
Please be assured that I will continue to fight against this Bill and any attempts to erode our civil liberties both in parliament and beyond.
Kind regards,
Nadia
Kate Wilson’s landmark #SpyCops case is starting now. Livestream: click this link, then “Join From Your Web Browser” & enter the Conference Alias & your name.
https://meet.video.justice.gov.uk/go/f2de00d5-fb1d-4729-852d-eca80e8c88f0/
Conference Alias: hmcts522@meet.video.justice.gov.uk
In these exceptionally volatile circumstances, in which protests can be expected to continue, in Bristol and elsewhere, the NUJ has issued additional advice to members on staying safe.
The NUJ is very concerned that during “Kill the Bill” protests in Bristol, there have been instances of journalists being threatened and injured, as a consequence of the actions of both police and protesters.
In many instances it may be that the journalists were not targeted deliberately, but the situation is of extreme concern.
The union will always stand firm for the right of bona-fide newsgatherers to do their jobs without fear of threats to their well-being.
Journalists are categorised by the government as key workers under Covid-19 restrictions. The right of bona-fide newsgatherers to conduct their legitimate work must be protected and safeguarded by all.
In these exceptionally volatile circumstances, in which protests can be expected to continue, in Bristol and elsewhere, the NUJ has issued additional advice to members on staying safe.
Members have a duty to protect themselves and not to put their health or safety at risk.
https://www.nuj.org.uk/resource/nuj-advice-on-covering-protests.html