Video Projection on buildings on the Canal Waterside, Nottingham

Experimental Art. Shame it didn’t file the space though …

This actually happend on wednesday evening, yesterday. But just got round to putting ’em up.

More piccys on PhotoBlog at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=106924

Experimental Art. Shame it didn’t fill the space though …

This actually happend on wednesday evening, yesterday. But just got round to putting ’em up.

I’ve been interested in slide projection for years. Have mainly done shows at festivals and the like. Have also put projection on buildings. I use 5 Carousel projectors to mix and match still photos, to keep a narative going. Having seen the piece that was done here, I was a little under impressed, since I’ve been able to do 8 times the size show, routinely. The differnce being this was video. So, I guess technology will advance and catch up, eventually. Good to see this stuff happening though. More, More ….

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Walking at Lathkill Dale: Derbyshire Peak District

Out and about along Lathkill Dale, towards Monyash. Out along the River Lathkill heading west to Cales Dale. Then back along the tops. OS Ref: 119SK203662

Cloudy and a bit grey all day, until the evening, then the sun peeked out occasionally. Just as camera run out of memory …… ! Oh well.

More pictures on my Photoblog at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=106887

and a map of the district at:

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=417500&y=365500&z=3&sv=417500,365500&st=4&ar=N&dn=758

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Stealing Back the Airwaves

http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,63343,00.html/wn_ascii

Please don’t call Stephen Dunifer a pirate. He’s a microbroadcaster, or, at least, a former one.

As Dunifer tells it, the term “pirate radio,” though once a badge of honor, is misleading. Pirates are criminals, he might tell you, while microbroadcasters are Tom Paine-like patriots.

Dunifer dreams of reclaiming the airwaves, neighborhood by neighborhood, from the corporate powers that be. To that end, he’s spent the past several years training would-be do-it-yourself broadcasters. His four-day Radio Summer Camps, sponsored by Free Radio Berkeley, offer how-tos for building transmitters and antennas, along with advice on handling any FCC agents that might come knocking. The camps begin in June.

With a few hundred bucks and a bit of know-how, potential pirates, er, microbroadcasters, could hop the airwaves right away.

Katie Jacoby, a junior at Bard College in New York, spent her winter break in one of Dunifer’s training sessions, and earlier this month launched Free Radio Annandale, an unlicensed station at 92.5 FM. After overcoming some logistical problems — Jacoby had to put her antenna up a tree — she began broadcasting hip-hop and punk music and politically oriented programming including Democracy Now.

“It’s been extremely empowering to follow the DIY ethic,” she said. “What’s even more exciting is that I am continually inspired to learn more about radio technology … and I’ve really started to think about the facets of society that constrict our ability to communicate. When others hear of the crazy projects I do, they get inspired too. It’s infectious.”

Building your own station is also illegal. Dunifer advises his students to enlist the help of an attorney before hopping the airwaves. But he describes microbroadcasting as “electronic civil disobedience” rather than a typical criminal act.

“As far as I’m concerned, the real pirates are the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) and their member stations,” Dunifer said, referring to the powerful lobbying group. “They’ve stolen the airwaves with the full complicity of the FCC and Congress.”

Can microbroadcasters grab them back? Dunifer thinks so. Put enough Katie Jacobys on the air at once, Dunifer suggests, and you could create a 21st-century equivalent to the Boston Tea Party.

Imagine this: A thousand little stations send radio programming across cities and towns from senior centers, dorm rooms and attics. The understaffed FCC would be powerless to shut them down. Audiences would have substantive content choices. No one would tune into Top-40 radio. And the media moguls would slink back into their caves.

OK, so the scenario is a bit far-fetched. But the FCC and Big Radio are obviously paying attention to the microbroadcasters — it was pressure from independent broadcasters that forced the FCC to grant a limited number of low-power, or LPFM, radio licenses to community organizations, a decision that the NAB resisted.

Still, Pete Tridish, a recovering pirate and head of the low-power radio advocacy group Prometheus Radio Project, thinks pirate stations on their own won’t cause enough of a ripple in Washington. He is lobbying to have the FCC cough up more LPFM licenses, including in urban areas.

“Having tried it, I don’t think a strategy just of civil disobedience will work,” Tridish said. “The pirates’ ability to be civilly disobedient is out of proportion to the problem they are trying to change.”

That problem is media concentration. Critics say that the 1996 Telecommunications Act turned radio into a preprogrammed monolith as independent, local radio stations were gobbled up by conglomerates, including Clear Channel, which now owns 1,200 stations in 230 markets. (Click here for the case against Clear Channel.)

For some media activists, working with the FCC to solve perceived problems with the mass media is counterintuitive. Dunifer spent four years banging heads with the feds while fighting an injunction against his station, Free Radio Berkeley. His defense: The FCC was stepping on his Bill of Rights.

“This was a First Amendment issue,” Dunifer said. “When you have a system that allocates access depending on money, that’s not free speech.

“Our core argument was that the FCC’s rules and regulations constitute an artificially high barrier to free speech. If the government is going to regulate First Amendment rights, they have to do it in the least-restrictive means possible. But, at this point, unless you have tons of money you can’t even enter the (broadcasting) game.”

Dunifer’s success in court was shocking — it undermined, to an extent, the FCC’s entire existence — but temporary. The injunction against Free Radio Berkeley stands.

But those who can’t broadcast, teach. Dunifer’s summer camps are an attempt to seed an army of microbroadcasters to reclaim what he calls “stolen property: the airwaves, a public resource.”

“We need an alternative media to bring alternative viewpoints and to give us access to music and art and poetry and other forms of expression,” Dunifer said. “It’s fundamental to the democratic process. If you don’t have an open media that’s freewheeling and chaotic and a wonderful mess, you don’t have democracy.”

Posted in . | Leave a comment

George Fredrick Handel

I’m one of the man’s greatest fans. I like so much of the different styles he’s produced. He is famous for imperial ‘the king is great’ type music, but i think some of these are soo sensitive. I put them on my server to share here.

[128kbs, so depending on your modem, might be best to ‘right-click’, then ‘save target’ to disk and then play]

I would like to hear ‘As Steals the Morn upon the Night’ over a quality system at Stonehenge on solstice morn!! What would the papers and English Heritage say about that?

A few pieces I’m listening to now ::

Handel – As Steals the Morn upon the Night

Handel – Where’er you walk

Handel – Ombra mai fu

Handel – Messiah – I Know That My Redeemer Liveth

oh, and this is the noisy stuff he’s good at 🙂

I used this piece, in a couple of slide shows on the Mayday Protests in Parliament Square, London

Handel – Zadok The Priest

Mayday2000 protest, London

* * * * * *

BBC2 have just done a program on Handels Water Music and an attempted recreation of the splendour of the day. The Water Music is so famous, I don’t need to put it here. Go to the library and borrow it.

Just for your info, [well those that are interested anyway, here’s a report from the The Daily Courant]

17 July 1717: The King travels by barge on the river Thames from Whitehall to Chelsea. The Water Music (HWV 348-50) is performed three times during that trip. According to a report from the London newspaper, the “Daily Courant” for 1717. All banged out for the Elector of Hanover and now George 1.

Check out the chronology of the politics of the time at http://gfhandel.org/chron1.htm and you’ll see that Handel is doing a PR job, to make the Hanovarian King, and acceptable Englishman.

Our present lot, the Saxe-Coburg Gotha’s [or, the Windsors if you prefer] http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp also German imports, have no such equivalent. !!

sent to Berlin by Friedrich Bonet, the Prussian Ambassador to London:

“About eight in the evening the King repaired to His barge, into which were admitted the Duchess of Bolton, Countess Godolphin, Mad. de Kilmanseck (sic. Kielmansegge), Mrs Were and the Earl of Orkney, the Gentleman of the Bedchamber in Waiting. Next to the King’s barge was that of the musicians, about 50 in number, who played on all kinds of instruments, to wit trumpets, horns, hautboys (oboes), bassoons, German flutes, French flutes, violins, and basses; but there were no singers. The music had been composed especially by the famous Handel, a native of Halle, and His Majesty’s Principal Court Composer. His Majesty approved of it so greatly that he caused it to be repeated three times in all, altogether each performance last an hour — namely twice before and once after supper. The evening was all that could be desired for the festivity, the number of barges and above all of boats filled with people desirous of hearing was beyond counting. In order to make this entertainment the more exquisite, Mad. de Kilmanseck had arranged a choice supper in the late Lord Ranelagh’s villa at Chelsea on the river, where the King went at one in the morning. He left at three o-clock and returned to St. James’s about half past four. The concert cost Baron Kilmanseck ÂŁ150 for the musicians alone. Neither the Prince nor the Princess (of Wales) took any part in this festivity.”

19 July 1717: London newspaper article from the “Daily Courant”

“On Wednesday Evening, at about 8, the King took Water at Whitehall in an open Barge, wherein were also the Dutchess of Bolton, the Dutchess of Newcastle, the Countess of Godolphin, Madam Kilmarnock (sic. Kielmansegge), and the Early of Orkney. And went up the River towards Chelsea. Many other Barges with Persons of Quality attended, and so great a Number of Boats, that the whole River in a manner was cover’d; a City Company’s Barge was employ’d for the Musick, wherein were 50 Instruments of all sorts, who play’d all the Way from Lambeth (While the Barges drove with the Tide without Rowing, as far as Chelsea), the finest Symphonies, compos’d express for this Occasion, by Mr Hendel, which his Majesty liked so well, that he caus’d it to be plaid over three times in going and returning. At Eleven his Majesty went a-shore at Chelsea, where a Supper was prepar’d, and there was another fine Consort of Musick, which lasted till 2; after which His Majesty came again into his Barge and return’d the Same Way, the Music continuing to play til he landed.”

The Daily Courant [Originals]

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Naomi Campbell Triumphs In Privacy Battle

By a majority of three to two, the House of Lords has reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal (as reported in our early warning of October 2002) and reinstated the judgment of Mr Justice Morland in the High Court (see our early warning of March 2002).

The action arose from a report by the Daily Mirror (including a photograph) that Naomi Campbell was attending meetings with Narcotics Anonymous to beat her addiction to drugs, an addiction which she had previously denied. The core issue before the court was whether the publication at issue “was legitimate in that the public interest in favour of publication outweighed any public interest in the protection” of Naomi Campbell’s rights of confidentiality.

The dissenting judgments came from Lord Nicholls and Lord Hoffman. Lord Nicholls, despite finding against Ms Campbell commented: “The importance of freedom of expression has been stressed often and eloquently, the importance of privacy less so. But it too lies at the heart of liberty in a modern state. A proper degree of privacy is essential for the well being and development of an individual.”

After observing that there was no “all embracing” cause of action for “invasion of privacy”, Lord Nicholls observed that “the time has come to recognise that the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence.” He went on to observe that “the touchstone of private life is whether in respect of the disclosed facts the person in question had a reasonable expectation of privacy.” Lord Nicholls however concluded that Naomi Campbell’s privacy rights were not infringed, and dismissed the appeal.

Lord Hoffman identified the point dividing the House as a narrow one, namely whether in exposing falsehoods on the part of Ms Campbell about her use of drugs “the newspaper went too far in publishing associated facts about her private life.”

Lord Hoffman also observed that there is no general cause of action for privacy in this jurisdiction, but stressed that “the right to privacy is in a general sense one of the values, and sometimes the most important value, which underlies a number of more specific causes of action, both at common law and under various statutes”. Lord Hoffman endorsed the view expressed by the Court of Appeal when it said that when publication of confidential information is justified in the public interest, “the journalist must be given reasonable latitude as to the manner in which the information is conveyed to the public or his Article 10 right to freedom of expression will be unnecessarily inhibited.”

Like Lord Nicholls, Lord Hoffman also dismissed the appeal on the facts, while upholding the general principle that the privacy of the individual should be protected under the UK law.

Lord Hope made a strong point of the need for privacy in any battle against an addiction to drugs or alcohol. He also rejected the dismissal by the Court of Appeal of the analogy between information that Naomi Campbell was receiving therapy from Narcotics Anonymous and information about details of a medical condition or its treatment. He said that he thought that the trial judge was right to regard the details of Naomi Campbell’s attendance at Narcotics Anonymous as private information which gave rise to a duty of confidence.

Lord Hope also criticised the Court of Appeal’s approach of judging whether the disclosure of the information “would have offended the reasonable man of ordinary susceptibilities” on the mind of the reader, rather than the mind of the person who is affected by the publicity. He then looked at striking the balance between the rights according to Article 8 and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and concluded that this infringement of Naomi Campbell’s right to privacy could not be justified in weighing those two competing rights, and allowed the appeal.

Baroness Hale conducted a balancing exercise between the Article 8 right of Naomi Campbell and the Article 10 right of the Daily Mirror. Baroness Hale drew a distinction between various types of speech, placing political speech as the most important. Here, however, the newspaper had disclosed “intimate details of a fashion model’s private life”, which they clearly regarded as a rather less public interest. She concluded by citing the Press Complaints Commission Code of Practice as it referred to privacy, and concluded that on applying these principles she should allow the appeal.

Lord Carswell also rejected the distinction made in the Court of Appeal between information concerning therapy at Narcotics Anonymous and details of the treatment of a medical condition. He considered that the decision was a delicately balanced one, but concluded that the information published concerning Naomi Campbell’s therapy at Narcotics Anonymous constituted “a considerable intrusion into her private affairs, which was capable of causing substantial distress, and on her evidence did cause it to her.” He therefore considered that the balance came down in favour of Naomi Campbell, and also allowed the appeal.

The balancing exercise between the rights of privacy and free speech conducted by the House of Lords makes the job of lawyers advising in this field extremely difficult. Two fundamental rights collide when such issues arise, and it is very often not so much a legal judgment but one of instinct and principle which will determine whether the court will intervene on an issue of privacy or not. However, as all the judges agreed, some protection for privacy is essential in the UK law, and that at least has been established by this majority decision of the House of Lords.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Altered State of the Union

A ‘spoof’ video, of President Bush’s State of the Union address.

http://fuckitall.com/bsh

http://fuckitall.com/bsh/union1.wmv

So that’s the funnies…..

But the following isn’t!!

A webpage of the ‘nasty’ us torture pictures, of Iraq Prisoners. I tell you, these are disgusting and lack civilisation, but do need to be seen.

http://www.albasrah.net/images/iraqi-pow/iraqi-pow

Posted in . | Leave a comment

BBC ? Diverse ways British people choose to party

I’m a Producer working for the BBC in Bristol. We’re making a documentary programme for BBC3 about the different and diverse ways British people choose to party. Within this programme I’d love to include a positive film about free parties and give the people on the scene a chance to have their say.

Would anyone be able to give me some advice about whether I have any chance of making this film and maybe even put me in touch with people who would be happy to take part? I understand that you may be wary of the media but like I say this film will have a very positive slant on the scene, the parties, and the people who make them happen.

I can be contacted by email on louise.mason@bbc.co.uk or by phone on 01179 742313.

Thanks,

Louise

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Direct Action Against War (DAAW) :: Yahoo Group

Visit us: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/directactionagainstwar

To join our network send a blank email to:

directactionagainstwar-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

The DAAW Message Board was initially formed in Jan 2003 to improve

communications around Direct Action, with communications around RAF

Fairford especially improved in the lead up to the Fairford & Menwith

Hill National Demos on 22nd March 2003.

After some interim problems, with the group overwhelmed by excessive

levels of spam & off-topic mail, DAAW is now reinvigorated, well

moderated, and able to continue functioning as a network hub for the

exchange of information on all issues around Direct Action.

Posted in . | Leave a comment

World Naked Bike Ride (WNBR) – Saturday, June 12, 2004

http://www.worldnakedbikeride.org

Check it out. At a city near you….

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Mistaken Identity :: A Public Meeting On The Government’s Proposed National Identity Card

http://www.privacyinternational.org/conference/missingid

Wednesday 19th May, 2004

13.30 – 17.00 hrs

The Old Theatre, London School of Economics

Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE

Organised by Privacy International in association with Liberty, Statewatch, Stand.org.uk

& the Foundation for Information Policy Research

Hosted by the Department of Information Systems of the London School of Economics

The government has introduced draft legislation for a national identity card. The card system will cost at least ÂŁ3 billion and is likely to become an essential part of life for everyone residing in the UK.

If the draft legislation is accepted by Parliament, everyone will be required to register for a card. Biometric scans of the face, fingers and eye will be taken. Personal details will be stored in a central database. A unique number will be issued that will become the basis for the matching of computer systems.

The proposed card may be required to access vital public services and to receive benefits. The government proposes to enforce the programme through numerous new criminal and civil offenses, including provision for unlimited financial penalty and up to ten years’ imprisonment.

The implications for everyone in the UK are far-reaching.

Join us at this important meeting to hear from key figures in the fields of law, politics, security, technology and human rights. Decide for yourself whether this is a plan that should be supported.

Details of the event programme will appear here soon. In the meantime please let us know if you would like to attend by emailing meeting@stand.org.uk

The event is free of charge to members of the public.

We have invited key people from the political, legal and research

spheres to speak, including David Blunkett, David Davis MP and Mark

Oaten MP.

If you are interested in attending please email meeting@stand.org.uk

We expect a substantial attendance, so please do reserve a seat as

soon as possible.

I look forward to seeing you at what will doubtless be an extremely

lively and informative event.

Please feel free to circulate this to anyone who you feel may be

interested in coming along.

Best wishes

Simon Davies : Director, Privacy International

Visiting Fellow London School of Economics

Media enquiries should be directed to simon@privacy.org

http://www.privacyinternational.org/conference/missingid

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Indymedia Item on SchNews Tour, Nottingham

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/05/290218.html

and

past Indymedia stories, I’ve put up

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Iraq War on Trial – Fairford five to appeal

Press Release :: For immediate use

Friday, April 30th, 2004

A five-day hearing in the case of activists charged with conspiracy and damage to military equipment at Fairford Air Base before the war on Iraq ended today at Bristol Crown Court. The main question before the hearing was whether the matter of the legality of the war could be examined by the UK courts, as part of the defence in a criminal trial.

Three groups of defendants – Paul Milling and Margaret Jones, Philip Pritchard and Toby Olditch, and Josh Richards, all say they have “lawful excuse” for their actions, because the war on Iraq was itself a crime. For the defence, Vaughan Lowe, Tony Jennings QC, Hugo Charlton and James Lewis QC have argued that their clients believed they were acting to prevent destruction and death in an illegal war.

Mr. Justice Grigson stated yesterday, “The hearing must proceed on the basis I will rule that the legality of the war is simply not justiciable in these courts.” In this provisional ruling, the judge accepted the prosecution’s case that British government foreign and military policy cannot be examined as part of a defence in English courts.

Speaking on behalf of Jones, Milling and Richards, Mr. James Lewis QC argued that the judge’s ruling makes it impossible for his clients to have fair trials.

Lawyers for Pritchard and Olditch are also expected to appeal.

The judge’s full written opinion is likely to be given within the next three weeks, with a “fast-track” appeal by the defence following immediately.

On the first day of the Bristol hearing, the judge agreed to allow unrestricted reporting of the Fairford Five cases by the press, as this is in accord with all five defendants’ wishes, and deemed unlikely to prejudice the conduct of the trials.

Milling and Jones said, when they were bailed after a week on remand last Spring, “We have nothing to be ashamed of. The criminals are in Whitehall and the White House.”

More information: Louise James, solicitor, Stokoe Partnership: 07714-851-043 / (020 8) 558 884

Margaret Jones (defendant) (0117) 94 66 885

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Mayday in Nottingham :: Robin Hood Statue to Market Square

Assemble 11 – 12noon at the Castle (Robin Hood’s Statue).

March to Old Market Square, led by Nottingham School of Samba, for rally with speakers on

theme of Trade Justice and Internationalism, live music and piratical entertainment.

May Day Trade Justice march and rally Saturday 1st May 12.00 pm

Meet at Nottingham Castle

“Global Pirates – Up Close and Ugly” themed trade justice march. Meet at Nottingham Castle at 12 noon to march to Market Square for a rally with live music, piratical entertainment and stalls. Speakers include Alan Simpson MP, Trade Union members and representatives of Oxfam and Christian Aid.

More Piccys on my FotoBlog at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=98095

and on IndymediaUK at:

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/05/290380.html

Posted in . | Leave a comment

SchNEWS at Ten Tour passed through Nottingham

The SchNEWS at Ten Tour passed through Nottingham on Thursday 29th April, I have just taken the opportunity to put work up, on this issue, and can be seen now at:

Nottingham Sumac Centre, 245 Gladstone Street, Nottingham NG7 6HX 8.30pm Tel. 0845 458 9595

For info about the tour at large:

http://www.schnews.org.uk/extras/tour.htm

&

For a sneek preview of my interests here, check my pages at:

http://tash.gn.apc.org/surv_10.htm

http://tash.gn.apc.org/watched1.htm

http://tash.gn.apc.org/surv_mday1.htm

all will give a ‘flavour’ of what I’m about here …….

more about it all on my blog at:

http://tash_lodge.blogspot.com/2004_04_18_tash_lodge_archive.html#108284111864191979

and my Fotopages at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=97625

Posted in . | Leave a comment

BBC Radio4 The Message: Undercurrents and Alternative Media

May bank holiday the anti-globalisation campaigners aren’t marching in London.

Away from the TV headlines will their cause wither and die? A combination of the post Iraq war domination of the news agenda and a change of strategy by the campaigners has caused them to give it London a miss this year.

So how much damage will the campaigners disappearance from the bulletins do to their cause?

Some are saying it’s actually helped them. They’re glad to get rid of those negative images of violence by their more extreme supporters and they are now using alternative media to further their cause.

They say by focussing on conflict and violence the news bulletins failing to report on what is actually happening with international campaigning groups.

Program website at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/themessage.shtml

You can hear the show again [it in the second part] at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/rams/themessage_current.ram

for the next 7 days. [real player required]

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Dissent a network of resistance – Against the G8

http://www.dissent.org.uk

The Dissent! network is made up of groups and individuals planning actions against the 2005 G8 summit. Dissent! is committed to taking direct action against the G8 and what it represents. Nobody owns the network and it has no leaders. Anyone who claims to speak on behalf of the network is lying.

We aim to disrupt the G8 and prevent their summit circus from taking place as planned. We still have a lot of time before June 2005: time to reflect on our struggles, to dream, and to create new ideas.

This is a call to participate, to use our networks and our experiences and our strength to build for summer 2005

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Photo Exhibition of my Surveillance Work

Have introduced this work to you, over the last few days. But the main event, is tomorrow, so, if in the area, get down there.

Because SchNEWS at Ten Tour is passing through Nottingham on Thursday 29th April, I have just taken the opportunity to put work up, on this issue, and can be seen now at:

Nottingham Sumac Centre, 245 Gladstone Street, Nottingham NG7 6HX 8.30pm Tel. 0845 458 9595

More work to be seen at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=95894

also, earlier on my blog at:

http://tash_lodge.blogspot.com/2004_04_18_tash_lodge_archive.html#108276208611419918

http://tash_lodge.blogspot.com/2004_04_18_tash_lodge_archive.html#108284111864191979

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Gang Zhao :: Chinese Photographer

Just took a look at this chaps exhibition at the Lakeside Galleries of the University of Nottingham. I think it is a splendid set of ‘photo-documentary’, and I commend it to you all. Do go and take a look …… He is a fellow student of Nottingham Trent University, where he to studied photography .

Wallner Gallery, D H Lawrence Pavilion, Lakeside Arts Centre, University of Nottingham

event: One Couple One Child: Gang Zhao

Recent documentary photography of Chinese society.

times: Mon-Sat 11am-5pm (performance eves 11am-11pm),ends May 2 2004

cost: free

[BJP Entry] http://db.riskwaters.com/public/showPage.html?page=101463

gang zhao [photogang2003@yahoo.com.cn]

I put a set of pictures I took at the exhibition, so you could see what you’re missing, check out at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=95334

Posted in . | Leave a comment

UK: Compulsory ID cards planned, again ……

White Paper with Identity Card Bill (pdf, 554k)

see: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/apr/uk-ID-card-Bill.pdf

Identity Card Bill (pdf, 300k)

see: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/apr/uk-ID-card-Bill2.pdf

The Home Secretary, David Blunkett, has announced that a Bill to introduce ID cards will be published in the next few weeks – which will include powers to make them compulsory without further legislation. Last week the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said there was no longer a civil liberties objection to the introduction of ID cards (see: Prime Minister says there is “no longer a civil liberties objection” to ID cards: Report and background) The only time in British history that there have been ID cards was during the Second World War – they were finally withdrawn in 1952, see: Statewatch: The history of ID cards in the UK

There has allegedly been some disagreement in the Cabinet but only over the issue of making ID cards compulsory. Cabinet Ministers like Patricia Hewitt, Department of Trade and Industry, has reservations about compulsory cards but supports the introduction of biometric passports and biometric driving licences which would, in time, cover 80% of the population.

Lots of different dates have been bandied about in the press but it appears to be the government intention to get the Bill through parliament in 2005 and introduce the scheme in 2007 – people renewing their passports and driving licences will be issued with combined cards with biometric data (probably fingerprints and facial scans).

At the moment passports have to be renewed every ten years – though there are plans in the pipeline in the UK and EU – to reduce this to five years so as to incorporate regular updates to the biometrics and other personal data on the card. Every year in the UK five million passports are issued (including replacements for lost or stolen passports). If a rolling programme is introduced it will probably take at least 10 years for every passport to be replaced.

The replacement of driving licences is even more problematic. In the UK licenses are issued from the time of passing the driving test (usually between the ages of 17-25) up until the age of 70. There are EU plans for the “harmonised” renewal of licences every 10 years but the draft legislation was rejected by the European Parliament last week and a new proposal is unlikely before 2005. The only people at the moment for whom the scheme could be introduced are for young people passing the test for the first time, for stolen or lost licences, and for that most dangerous category of all – the over 70’s. The great majority of driving licence-holders will have no need for a new one for decades.

It is therefore likely that it will be passport renewals that will drive this scheme which is unlikely to be complete before 2017.

Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor, comments:

“At the moment most passport renewals involve getting a picture taken in a photo-booth, filling in a form and sending both off with a cheque.

What is not realised is that this new scheme will require around five million people a year presenting themselves at “enrolment centres”, bringing with them documents to prove they are who they are, checks will be carried out on an unspecified number of state and commercial databases, their fingerprints will be taken and then they will have to pose for a facial scan. The biometric data will then be added to the contactless micro-chip together with personal data.

The likelihood is that by the time this scheme is in full swing the same passport-ID card will contain a person’s NHS health records and convictions for any offence and also be their bank and credit card. It is likely too that access to the data held on the card will be given to all law enforcement agencies, many state agencies (eg: welfare payments, tax and customs), employers, insurance companies, credit agencies and banks.

The only protection against the misuse and abuse of this mountain of personal data is the Data Protection Act which quite simply does not work because it lacks resources and real powers of enforcement – even the European Commission’s belated review admits this.

This proposal has little or nothing to do with combating terrorism. The government is cynically exploiting public sentiment and fears to introduce a measure which has no place in a democratic society”

http://www.statewatch.org/news

* * * * * *

ID card trials to start next week: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3654621.stm

Testing the biometric facts: BBC News Online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3659255.stm

ID cards: an iCan briefing: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/ican/A2319176

Posted in . | Leave a comment

Ladybower and Strines Moor: Derbyshire Peak District

Just like a couple of days ago, weather wonderful, so took me and my feet on a wander about in the area, taking these pictures. Hope you enjoy …….

A detailed map of the area in question:

http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=418500&y=388500&z=3&sv=418500,388500&st=4&mapp=newmap.srf&searchp=newsearch.srf&dn=741

More pictures on Fotopages at:

http://tashcamuk.fotopages.com/?entry=93709

Posted in . | Leave a comment