Day out at University of Nottingham Park

Posted in . | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Day out at University of Nottingham Park

Vaisakhi Parade in Nottingham. 2026

Posted in . | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Vaisakhi Parade in Nottingham. 2026

Vaisakhi Gallery

https://adobe.ly/4jJp3Uq

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Vaisakhi Gallery

Capoeira in Market Square, Nottingham

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Capoeira in Market Square, Nottingham

Charles Veitch on YouTube : Confrontationist

I asked Gemini AI: “What is the best way to deal with CharlesVeitch on YouTube?”

Charles Veitch is a controversial British YouTuber who creates content by walking through city centres, filming the public, and frequently engaging in confrontations with passersby, security guards, and protesters. His content heavily relies on provoking reactions, which he then uploads for his audience. Recently, his activities have even led to legal trouble; in early 2026, he was charged with a public order offence and banned from entering Manchester City Centre.

Because his channel relies entirely on “drama” and agitation to generate views and ad revenue, the best way to deal with him—both online and in the real world—is to starve him of the attention and engagement he needs.

Here is the best way to handle him, depending on how you are interacting with his presence:

1. Dealing with his content on YouTube

If you are tired of seeing his videos or want to push back against his style of content, the YouTube algorithm is your main battleground.

  • Do not click on his videos: Even a “hate watch” gives him a view, which boosts his channel in the YouTube algorithm and puts money in his pocket.
  • Do not comment: Leaving a negative comment or arguing with his supporters in the comment section is still registered as “engagement” by YouTube. The algorithm rewards videos with high engagement by recommending them to more people.
  • Block and remove from your feed: If his videos appear on your homepage, click the three dots (...) next to the video title and select “Don’t recommend channel”.
  • Report TOS violations: If a specific video clearly crosses the line into targeted harassment, inciting violence, or doxing (revealing private information), use YouTube’s reporting tool to flag the video for violating Community Guidelines.

2. Dealing with him in real life

If you encounter Charles Veitch filming in your town or city, the most effective strategy is absolute disengagement.

  • Ignore him completely: Do not look at the camera, do not answer his questions, and do not react to his provocations. His entire business model is based on getting people to stop, argue, or get angry. If you give him the silent treatment and walk right past him, your footage is completely useless to him because it is boring.
  • Do not argue the law: Many people make the mistake of confronting him by saying “you don’t have my permission to film me.” Under UK law, individuals generally have the right to film in public spaces without consent. Arguing this point with him just gives him the exact legal debate he has rehearsed hundreds of times, resulting in prime footage for his channel.
  • Do not get physical: Swiping at his camera or touching him is an easy way to get yourself arrested for assault. It also gives him the dramatic thumbnail and video title he wants.
  • Call the police only if a crime is committed: Because he is legally allowed to film in public, the police generally will not remove him just for being annoying. However, if his behaviour crosses the line into a genuine public order offence (e.g., using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behaviour that causes harassment, alarm, or distress)—which is exactly what he was charged with in Manchester—you should calmly walk away and report the incident to the police.

Ultimately, public agitators treat anger and frustration as currency. Responding with total apathy is the single most effective way to shut them down.

>>>>>>>

Controversial YouTuber Charlie Veitch charged with public order offence and banned from Manchester City Centre

Controversial YouTuber and self-styled citizen journalist Charlie Veitch, who regularly documents life in “dystopian” Manchester on the video sharing platform, has been charged with a public order offence and banned from entering Manchester City Centre.

A statement from Greater Manchester police said: “Following an investigation by our Manchester City Centre Neighbourhood Policing Team, Charles Veitch (05/08/1980) of Park Crescent, Derbyshire, has been charged with a Section 4A public order offence. He is set to appear at Manchester Magistrates’ Court on 30 June 2026. Mr Veitch has bail conditions that include not entering Manchester city centre inside the ring road.”

Veitch first rose to prominence as a high-profile 9/11 conspiracy theorist in the mid-noughties, and later appeared in the 2011 BBC documentary 9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip. He publicly renounced his views after speaking with architects, engineers, and victims’ relatives for the BBC investigation, leading to backlash from other figures in the online conspiracy sphere such as Infowars host Alex Jones, who cited Veitch’s change of heart as evidence that he had been compromised by a “very evil New World Order”.

More recently, Veitch has used his YouTube channel, which has 833k subscribers, to document “Broken Britain” with a particular emphasis on Manchester, where he regularly singles out vulnerable people, including the homeless and drug addicts, for his content. He also frequently documents pro-Gaza protests, and in a 2024 clip attracted criticism for confronting a female member of staff in Manchester People’s History Museum over their decision to wear a Keffiyah – an interaction which many online viewers considered to be “clickbait” and “harrassment”.

Outside Manchester, he has also divided audiences by claiming on his shows that parts of Huddersfield have a “third World vibe,” describing Nelson, Lancashire as “rough” and home to “some of the most abandoned nice buildings I have seen on my tour of dystopian Britain” and Barnsley as “pure Soviet.”

Veitch was born in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to a Brazilian mother and a Scottish merchant seaman father. He attended Edinburgh Academy and graduated from the University of Edinburgh with honours in philosophy.

https://www.prolificnorth.co.uk/news/controversial-youtuber-charlie-veitch-charged-with-public-order-offence-and-banned-from-manchester-city-centre

Posted in . | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Charles Veitch on YouTube : Confrontationist

‘Stop Trump’ Rally at Speakers Corner, Nottingham.

‘Stop Trump’ Rally at Speakers Corner, Nottingham. Speeches by Nadia Whittome MP and others … oh and a right-wing blogger came to visit!

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on ‘Stop Trump’ Rally at Speakers Corner, Nottingham.

Nadia Whittome MP at Stop Trump Rally, Nottingham

  Some people may say that isn’t this war happening to remove the brutal regime in Iran?

  It’s undeniable that people in Iran are severely repressed and brutalised by their own government, especially women, especially LGBTQ+ people and minority communities.

We know that democracy protestors have been killed in their thousands, creating a deep human rights crisis.

Demanding a stop to this war does not mean that we should ever look away from that.

But if anything, this illegal war has strengthened Iran’s authoritarian theocratic regime because dropping bombs on them doesn’t liberate the Iranian people from their brutal government.

  It doesn’t bring about democracy, it just kills innocent people.

  Trump and Netanyahu particularly like to claim that their war will free women from the Iranian regime.

  But their far right policies at home continue to prove that Trump and Netanyahu could not care less about women.

  Has the world suddenly forgotten that this is the man who stripped away abortion rights in America?

  Whose administration harms women and children and families in so many ways?

  So this selective feminism to…to justify wars, illegal wars, that will not fool any of us.

  We must continue standing up to Trump and Netanyahu.

  They have committed war crimes.

  They are eradicating entire neighbourhoods, displacing millions from their homes and destroying people’s futures.

  And our government should not be allowing the US to use UK bases in its attacks and it must work together with the international community to stop this war.

  Thank you everyone, solidarity!

  Thank you very much Nadia

Posted in . | Comments Off on Nadia Whittome MP at Stop Trump Rally, Nottingham

Surfin’ (Ernest ranglin) – Jazz Roots Quartet – Groupe reggae jazz Lille Hauts de France

Posted in . | Comments Off on Surfin’ (Ernest ranglin) – Jazz Roots Quartet – Groupe reggae jazz Lille Hauts de France

Ernest Ranglin & The High Notes – Surfin (live)

Posted in . | Comments Off on Ernest Ranglin & The High Notes – Surfin (live)

Ernest Ranglin, Surfin’

What a bass !!

Posted in . | Comments Off on Ernest Ranglin, Surfin’

A Photographic Life-134.5: What Does Photography Mean To You? Grant Scott In Conversation

A Photographic Life: Photography Podcast 

To mark the publication of his book What Does Photography Mean to You? The presenter of the A Photographic Life podcast Grant Scott spoke online with Bill Shapiro about the book, his process creating the podcast and what he has learnt from listening to the photographers who answer the question he sets them each week. This is an edited version of that conversation.

Grant Scott is the founder/curator of United Nations of Photography, a Senior Lecturer and Subject Co-ordinator: Photography at Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, a working photographer, and the author of Professional Photography: The New Global Landscape Explained (Routledge 2014), The Essential Student Guide to Professional Photography (Taylor Francis 2015), New Ways of Seeing: The Democratic Language of Photography (Taylor Francis 2019). His most recent book What Does Photography Mean to You? was published by Bluecoat Press in November 2020. Each week Grant presents the A Photographic Life podcast in whic he asks photographers from around the world the question that forms the title of his latest book.

Bill Shapiro served as the Editor-in-Chief of LIFE, the legendary photo magazine; LIFE’s relaunch in 2004 was the largest in Time Inc. history. Later, he was the founding Editor-in-Chief of LIFE.com, which won the 2011 National Magazine Award for digital photography. Bill is the author of several books, among them Gus & Me, a children’s book he co-wrote with Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards. In 2018, he published What We Keep, which was recently turned into a streaming series with Cynthia Erivo serving as executive producer. A fine-art photography curator for New York galleries and a consultant to photographers, he also serves on the Art Advisory Board for the SXSW festival. He writes about photography for the New York Times Magazine, the Atlantic, Vogue, and Esquire, among others. On Instagram, he’s @billshapiro.

What Does Photography Mean to You?
Author: Grant Scott
ISBN 9781908457585: Softcover: Mono 190 x 130mm portrait + 192pp
£9.95 plus p and p
www.bluecoatpress.co.uk

Posted in . | Tagged | Comments Off on A Photographic Life-134.5: What Does Photography Mean To You? Grant Scott In Conversation

Des at the Sherwood Library Opening

Posted in . | Tagged , | Comments Off on Des at the Sherwood Library Opening

Sherwood Library opening …. finally!

Years go by …. well 6 years of ping pong between Nottingham City Council and the developers on whos fault stuff happening was …. Anyway, it’s open now. There was the un-official campaigners opening {without them, we would still be waiting]. Followed by the official gig with council leader, officers, kids etc …

Posted in . | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Sherwood Library opening …. finally!

Tash, a supporter of the Sea Shepherd

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Tash, a supporter of the Sea Shepherd

This Flashmob recreates Rembrandt’s Night Watch

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on This Flashmob recreates Rembrandt’s Night Watch

The Crime and Policing Bill progress

There so much happening every day that stories which would once have made national news and debate aren’t even mentioned.

After successive authoritarian public order legislation was passed by the Tories, Labour MPs just voted to pass yet more repressive laws using their undeserved thumping majority. (Not that any except the Greens oppose them)

The Crime and Policing Bill is now at the final stage and will almost certainly be passed unamended unless there is stiff opposition in the anachronistic Lords. I’m not holding my breath.

Amongst other things, police will be handed the power to ban any protest on the grounds of ‘cumulative disruption’ – basically if a protest happens once, that’s it. You can’t come back and do it again if nothing changes. Bizarrely, they can also ban protests happening in the same place even if previous protests had nothing to do with what you’re protesting about. Whitehall for example.

Effective protests often recur in the same or similar places. And no protest movement has ever brought about change through a one-off demonstration. Landmark democratic struggles, such as the campaign for women’s suffrage and the movement against apartheid in South Africa, all relied on the ‘cumulative’ impact of repeated protests over many years.

We’ve reached a stage now where everything is banned except what is permitted, in very specific ways, determined by police. If you don’t ever think about making any protest you might not be bothered. But on the day when things get so bad you feel the need to do something about it, you’ll find you’ve been gagged and your hands tied as soon as you set foot outside your door.

The new powers within the Crime and Policing Bill were motivated by lobbying from the Zionists following the succession of huge anti-genocide protests. But the powers will apply to everything and everybody, the ratchet is always up. It never comes back down.

Progressive and democratic politicians would be repealing clauses in the authoritarian laws passed by Patel and Braverman but Mahmoud, Starmer, Lammy and the rest of Blue Labour are just the same Right wing Zionist stooges as the Tories were.

G

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on The Crime and Policing Bill progress

Proposed new police powers ‘a draconian threat to the right to protest’

The government’s Crime and Policing Bill returns to the commons for its final stages on Tuesday 14 April. MPs will consider lords amendments, including a proposal that will grant the police sweeping new powers to restrict or effectively ban protests (Lords Amendment 312).

The government introduced Amendment 312 in the lords without a vote. This means it has so far avoided scrutiny or debate in the commons. Andy McDonald MP has tabled a motion to oppose the amendment. His motion has broad cross-party support, reflecting the widespread opposition to the government’s extreme proposal. MPs will have their only chance to push it to a vote on 14 April.

‘Cumulative disruption’

If it becomes law, Lords Amendment 312 would require the police to take into account any “cumulative disruption” caused by past or future planned protests in the same “area” when deciding whether to impose restrictions.

The amendment doesn’t define what constitutes the same ‘area’. It could include an entire town or the whole of central London. And it won’t matter whether the protests involve the same cause or people.

For example, an anti-racist march could be blocked from Whitehall because a farmers’ protest happened there six months earlier. Or police could restrict a Pride march because a far-right demonstration recently happened in the same town.

Although government statements make clear these powers have come forward in response to the mass national marches for Palestinian rights since October 2023, the impact of this change of law would be wide-ranging on protest groups in general.

Over 45 civil society organisations have joined forces to demand the government withdraws this proposal. These include the Trades Union Congress, Liberty and Greenpeace. They join more than 100 leading legal scholars and lawyers and over 100 Members of Parliament.

The UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and of Association, Gina Romero, has also warned that she has serious concerns on the knock-on effects of the proposals. For example, authoritarian governments around the world could use them as a template.

Trying to make protest toothless

Even before this proposal, the UK’s protest laws had attracted widespread criticism. Extensive police powers already exist which severely limit the right to protest. These include the previous government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023.

Lords Amendment 312 follows a succession of illiberal anti-protest laws. It represents a major assault on the freedoms of expression, association and assembly that underpin protest rights. This government, or any future one, could use it to effectively stamp out political demonstrations, actions that are part of industrial disputes, and protests altogether.

Effective protests often recur in the same or similar places. And no protest movement has ever brought about change through a one-off demonstration. Landmark democratic struggles, such as the campaign for women’s suffrage and the movement against apartheid in South Africa, all relied on the ‘cumulative’ impact of repeated protests over many years.

On Monday 13 April at 3pm, campaigners and a cross-party group of MPs handed in petitions condemning the government’s attacks on our right to protest, totalling over 40,000 signatures. On Tuesday 14 April, Palestine Solidarity Campaign has called a demonstration outside parliament at 6pm to coincide with any vote on Lords Amendment 312.

Ryvka Barnard, deputy director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, said:

This proposal should alarm everyone who believes that democratic freedoms must be defended. It represents the government’s latest draconian attempt to erode our civil liberties in order for it to maintain its complicity in Israel’s ongoing genocide against the Palestinian people.

The UK’s political and military support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza, its continued ethnic cleansing in the illegally occupied West Bank, and illegal strikes on Iran and Lebanon, continue to cause huge public outrage and fuel the ongoing protests involving hundreds of thousands of ordinary people across the country.

Instead of listening to the public and addressing its responsibilities under international law, the government is trying to repress protest through ever more authoritarian laws.

The right to protest, including in solidarity with the Palestinian people, is a precious democratic principle under threat from this government, and it must be defended.

Featured image via the Canary

Posted in . | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Proposed new police powers ‘a draconian threat to the right to protest’

Bass

Posted in . | Tagged , | Comments Off on Bass

Base44 AI App creation

Have just been messing with the AI App-building Base44 … this is what it came back with, when asking it based on my website at alanlodge.co.uk

I asked:
“Make an app promoting my photography exclusively based on my website at https://alanlodge.co.uk

https://tash-dissent-archive.base44.app

Posted in . | Tagged | Comments Off on Base44 AI App creation

Ian McKellen performs speech about immigrants by Shakespeare from Thomas More 

Ian McKellen performs Sir Thomas More, Act II, Scene 4, William Shakespeare (c. 1593) at the Royal Shakespeare Memorial Theatre, Stratford-Upon-Avon for the BBC’s ‘Shakespeare Live! From the RSC’.

What is the Strangers’ Case monologue?

The riot that the play references took place on May 1, 1517 and is referred to as Evil May Day. Thomas More, the then under-sheriff of London, was sent to calm the rioters and persuade them to go home. According to the chronicler Edward Hall (c. 1498–1547), a fortnight before the riot an inflammatory xenophobic speech was made on Easter Tuesday by a preacher known as “Dr. Bell” at St. Paul’s Cross at the instigation of John Lincoln, a broker. Bell accused immigrants of stealing jobs from English workers and of “eat[ing] the bread from poor fatherless children.” 

From Act II, Scene 4 of Sir Thomas More:

You’ll put down strangers,
Grant them removed, and grant that this your noise
Hath chid down all the majesty of England;
Imagine that you see the wretched strangers,
Their babies at their backs and their poor luggage,
Plodding to the ports and coasts for transportation,
And that you sit as kings in your desires,
Authority quite silent by your brawl,
And you in ruff of your opinions clothed;
What had you got? I’ll tell you: you had taught
How insolence and strong hand should prevail,
How order should be quelled; and by this pattern
Not one of you should live an agèd man,
For other ruffians, as their fancies wrought,
With self same hand, self reasons, and self right,
Would shark on you, and men like ravenous fishes
Would feed on one another…

Say now the king,
As he is clement if th’offender mourn,
Should so much come too short of your great trespass
As but to banish you, whither would you go?
What country, by the nature of your error,
Should give you harbor? Go you to France or Flanders,
To any German province, to Spain or Portugal,
Nay, anywhere that not adheres to England,
Why, you must needs be strangers: would you be pleased
To find a nation of such barbarous temper,
That, breaking out in hideous violence,
Would not afford you an abode on earth,
Whet their detested knives against your throats,
Spurn you like dogs, and like as if that God
Owed not nor made not you, nor that the elements
Were not all appropriate to your comforts,
But chartered unto them, what would you think
To be thus used? This is the strangers’ case;
And this your mountainish inhumanity.

Posted in . | Tagged | Comments Off on Ian McKellen performs speech about immigrants by Shakespeare from Thomas More