“Get pensioners to pick fruit and vegetables in the fields” says Tory minister https://t.co/cQFJGbP0tz via @thecanarysays
— Alan Lodge (@tashuk) May 7, 2017
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
from Twitter https://twitter.com/tashuk
“Get pensioners to pick fruit and vegetables in the fields” says Tory minister https://t.co/cQFJGbP0tz via @thecanarysays
— Alan Lodge (@tashuk) May 7, 2017
//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
from Twitter https://twitter.com/tashuk
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b05128yj
Sorting and shuffling in Adobe Lightroom ….. oh god, when will this end?
The chief constable of Sussex Police has labelled his staff “everyday heroes” for using the UK’s Terrorism Act to arrest a photographer taking pictures of Hove Town Hall.
Professional snapper Eddie Mitchell was detained for an hour by police in the south coast town on Thursday (May 4). A police employee who was not a sworn constable* decided, according to Mitchell’s detailed account, to demand an explanation of what he was doing while he was taking “general view” photos of the town hall.
Mitchell, who has worked in the area for 18 years and supplies pictures to national newspapers, agencies and the BBC, refused to answer the woman’s questions as she waved a Sussex Police lanyard and ID card in his face.
He did, however, agree to go with her into the town hall, where police have a “pop-up station.” Two constables searched him, citing Section 43 of the Terrorism Act 2000. The relevant parts state:
(1) A constable may stop and search a person whom he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist to discover whether he has in his possession anything which may constitute evidence that he is a terrorist.
(2) A constable may search a person arrested under Section 41 to discover whether he has in his possession anything which may constitute evidence that he is a terrorist.
“They were in a corner because they had to let me go seeing as I hadn’t done anything – and they were so stuck they took a total abuse of power by quoting the Terror Act,” he told Daily Mail Online.
Chief Superintendent Lisa Bell, divisional policing commander for Brighton and Hove, said: “I am satisfied that the action my officers took was completely appropriate when the threat level is at severe, meaning an attack is highly likely,” adding that if Mitchell had “identified himself” to the woman employee, “the matter would have been resolved in minutes.”
The Guardian reported: “Sussex Police were unable to answer questions on what, specifically, about Mitchell’s actions had provoked a reasonable suspicion that he was a terrorist and under what powers a member of its civilian staff had demanded an explanation and a statement from him.”
Following the public outcry at the police’s heavy-handed treatment of Mitchell, who insists he has the “utmost respect for Sussex Police and the work they do,” Chief Constable Giles York weighed in, obviously feeling the pressure.
“The terrorism risk nationally remains severe, and in view of recent events I expect my staff and the public to be vigilant and report unusual activity,” he said in a bizarre statement on the force website. “I totally support and am immensely proud of my officers and staff and I try really hard to recognise personally their ‘everyday heroism’.”
The Association of Chief Police Officers, predecessor to today’s National Police Chiefs Council, issued a policy statement in 2010 after the routine abuse of police powers towards photographers became unignorable.
A letter by the chair of ACPO’s communication advisory group was issued to all police forces in the country, reminding policemen that instead of harassing photographers and misusing the law, they ought to be working with them. A copy of it can be found via the Lancashire and Cheshire Photographic Union’s website, and it says: “There are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place. Therefore members of the public and press should not be prevented from doing so.”
This policy has remained in force ever since, including the rebranding of ACPO to the National Police Chiefs’ Council after Theresa May, as Home Secretary, ordered the organisation be shut down.
Sheffield University lecturer Mark Hanna, author of media law bible McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists, said to us: “We all want the police to be vigilant. But ideally the Chief Constable would have admitted clearly that there was no ground ‘to reasonably suspect’ Eddie of being a terrorist, or explained what his officers felt that ground was. The Chief’s statement does not refer at all to the process his officers followed under the 2000 Act. Eddie conducted himself with dignity. The Chief’s statement is ‘flannel’.”
A spokesman for the I’m A Photographer Not A Terrorist campaign group told The Register: “The use of Section 43 of the Terrorism Act – a power requiring reasonable suspicion a person is a terrorist – to detain and search a photographer and view PACE protected journalistic material, is utterly bizarre. Taking photographs of a public building comes nowhere close to establishing ‘reasonable suspicion’ of terrorism.”
Eddie Mitchell has previously come into conflict with police while doing his job. Last year three constables arrested him while he was taking aerial footage of a fire in Surrey. The constables, having handcuffed him, then took it in turns to have a play with his still-airborne drone, which he had been flying at about 150 feet. Mitchell is a licensed drone operator who had the landowner’s permission to be operating there. ®
* Police constables of all ranks swear an oath that admits them into the office of constable. The term “constable” is a bit old-fashioned nowadays and is generally synonymous with “police officer.” Being a constable is what gives police extra legal powers that lets them freely do things normal members of the public would commit a criminal offence by doing, such as kicking down doors and arresting people, Tasering them, etc.
Many police employees are not constables and so do not have these powers, though in various situations they can acquire and exercise some of them. Two examples are police community support officers and police station detention officers, who process prisoners arrested by constables.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/05/my_cops_are_heroes_says_chief_constable_whose_staff_arrested_a_photographer/
Phnat is shocked and alarmed to hear that a Brighton-based professional photographer was detained by police for an hour under terrorism laws.
@brightonsnapper Eddie Mitchell of AerialNews was taking photographs of Hove town hall when he approached and questioned by a passing member of police staff. When he declined to give his details on the grounds he was breaking no law, he followed instructions to attend the local police station, where two officers detained him used section 43 of the Terrorism Act, which gives power to stop and search to officers of anyone they “reasonably suspects to be a terrorist”.
In a statement Phnat said: “This incident, in which it appears a civilian member of staff stopped and demanded details from a photographer who was going about their lawful business before police officers appear to have conducted a highly irregular search, shows that there are still significant issues with the police when it comes to the rights of photographers, and their legal powers.
The use of Section 43 of the terrorism act, a power requiring reasonable suspicion a person is a terrorist, to detain and search a photographer and view PACE protected journalistic material, is utterly bizarre. Taking photographs of a public building comes nowhere close to establishing “reasonable suspicion” of terrorism.
To make matters worse for Sussex police, which has faced successful legal action over searching journalists before, their press office and now chief constable have decided to give their unquestioning support to the employees involved. This raises significant questions about the impartiality of any internal complaint process that may follow.
We hope Sussex Police will reflect on the law and national guidance and apologise to the photographer involved, retrain these staff and educate the members of senior management responsible for defending it.
Members of PHNAT’s committee are in touch with the photographer involved.”
Eddie Mitchell was detained by Sussex police for an hour under anti-terror laws while checks were carried out on his photographs
Hove town hall
The picture of Hove town hall that Eddie Mitchell was taking when police intervened. Photograph: Eddie MitchellKevin Rawlinson
Thursday 4 May 2017 22.40 BST
Last modified on Friday 5 May 2017 00.30 BSTPolice have been accused of abusing their powers by a professional photographer who was detained under anti-terror laws after he was seen taking pictures of Hove town hall on Thursday. Eddie Mitchell was held for about an hour while police checked his camera.
It was eventually decided that there was no reason to believe that the press photographer, who works for outlets including the BBC, was a terrorist.
“I respect wholeheartedly that the police have a job to do,” Mitchell said, “but there should be clarity on people taking pictures in a public place – it is not a crime … As far as I am concerned, it is a total misuse and abuse of power.”
Mitchell declined to explain who he was or what he was doing to a passing member of police staff on the grounds that he was not breaking any laws. Both he and Sussex police agreed that the conversation was not antagonistic.
After he followed an instruction to go to the police station to give a statement, two officers detained him under anti-terror laws. “The police didn’t want to back down and neither did I. I just wanted to stand my ground,” Mitchell said.
He was detained under section 43 of the Terrorism Act, which gives officers the power to stop and search anyone “he reasonably suspects to be a terrorist”. Sussex police confirmed that Mitchell was approached while taking the pictures and searched under the Terrorism Act because he refused to “provide information or identification”.
A statement read: “As a result of the search, which included the camera equipment he was using, it was established that his activity was not suspicious and he was allowed to leave.”
The chief superintendent of Sussex police, Lisa Bell, defended her officers, saying their actions were “completely appropriate when the threat level is at severe”. She added: “If the man had identified himself, then the matter could have been resolved in minutes.” Mitchell claimed his identity was established quickly from his BBC pass and a credit card.
Sussex police were unable to answer questions on what, specifically, about Mitchell’s actions had provoked a reasonable suspicion that he was a terrorist and under what powers a member of its civilian staff had demanded an explanation and a statement from him.
National Police Chiefs Council guidance states: “Police should not prevent anyone from taking photographs in public. This applies equally to members of the media and public seeking to record images, who do not need a permit to photograph or film in public places.”
Mitchell, who says he usually has a good relationship with Sussex police, has not yet decided whether or not to make a complaint. In 2014, he was arrested by another force while operating a drone professionally.
The trained drone pilot, who had approval from the Civil Aviation Authority to commercially operate drones, was released, and no further action was taken against him.
via Photographer held after taking pictures of Hove town hall | UK news | The Guardian
All of my instagram piccys, displayed at 2 sec intervals …… for some background eye candy 120mins.
Just finished a two day WordPress course:
The first W.E.B for S.M.E 2-Day workshop completed with 100% turnout! Thanks to all who attended and I hope you took plenty away and enjoyed the masterclass as much as I enjoyed delivering it! If you missed out this time, don’t worry, next week we will be releasing more dates across nottinghamshire and Derbyshire plus announcing masterclass workshops focussed on Joomla and Magento as well as WordPress! #enablinginnovation #ntu
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6265605524813938688/
Thus, I’m reminded that I have a blog and could well start to add more stuff here again!